| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
"John Smith" wrote in message ... Tad Danley wrote: I have started to experiment with EZNEC and am modeling a couple of loop antennas including some delta loops. I see references to hams using 4:1 baluns with these antennas, but the models I see show a feed point impedance of roughly 100 ohms. I'm not sure how a 4:1 balun would help - what am I missing? Thanks and 73, Tad Danley, K3TD Tad: A 2:1 construction of a "true" 2:1 balun is possible, however, driving a 100 ohm loop from 50 ohm coax does NOT require one--meaning, a 2:1 "RF TRANSFORMER" will suit your purposes, more than adequately. The winding to the 50 ohm source will be half the turns of the 100 ohm winding--and there is no electrical connection between windings--i.e., the 50 and 100 windings are separate on the core. Usually the turns ratio of an impedance-matching transformer is the square of the impedance ratio. If the turns ratio, primary to secondary, is N the secondary voltage Vo is N times the primary voltage Vi but the secondary current Io is the primary current Ii divided by N. If the primary is fed from a source of impedance Zi, and Zi = Vi/Ii, then on the secondary side we have Zo = Vo/Io = NVi/(Ii/N) = (NxN)Vi/Ii. So Zo = (N^2)Zi or N = square root of (Zo/Zi). An impedance ratio of 2 would require a turns ratio 1.4. I wonder if there's a reason why this case would be different. Chris |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Baluns.. | CB | |||
| Baluns | Antenna | |||
| Baluns | Homebrew | |||
| 1 to x baluns | Antenna | |||
| Baluns | Antenna | |||