Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#33
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Richard Clark" wrote in message ... On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 01:06:28 -0000, "christofire" wrote: With a pair of screened loops and a whip it is possible to receive separately the magnetic and electric fields associated with a radio signal and to record their strengths at different locations. This can reveal significant differences on account of building and electrical clutter, but only if the loop is adequately screened. No myth! What you describe is a direction finding system with a general antenna that can be switched in to sniff for a transmitter to take a bearing on. A commonplace design for this application. No, the loops were commutated in order to provide an omni-direction pattern in the horizontal plane and the receiver was switched between the loops and whip to measure H and E. This was used to establish for medium and long-wave broadcasting stations (in the UK) the field strength and receivability on ferrite-rod antennas. The loops are no more screened than any other, and careful observation of their construction details would reveal the necessary break in the screen which serves for balance only. The loop has to be split at some point to prevent it acting as a shorted turn - the splits were at the top in this case. Any claims to magnetic field separation are, as Mark well put it, a myth. The only way you could achieve this separation is by traveling at the speed of light with your antenna in that magnetic field, at its 90 degree peak to the electric field null. In a normal single, plane-polarised, far-field TEM radio wave the peaks of E and H occur at the same places and the same times, and the nulls of E and H occur at the same places and the same times. The peaks of both correspond to the peaks of current in the transmitting antenna by which they were generated, and the nulls of both correspond to the zero-crossings of the current. If you believe something is radiated in the far field when the current in the antenna is zero I would be intrigued to hear an explanation. This reduces the topic from the status of myth to that of absurd. You're entitled to your opinion. Chris 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Improve the Rec.Radio.Shortwave Newsgroup -by- Making On-Topic ... | Shortwave | |||
improve fm reception on transistor radio | Antenna | |||
5 Ways to Improve HD Radio Reception | Shortwave | |||
What are ferrite core chokes to improve radio reception? | Shortwave | |||
Realistic \ Radio Shack DX-200 improve audio mods | Shortwave |