Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#34
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
christofire wrote:
I'm aware of issues involved in claiming generation of separate E or H fields, as has been described by Kabbary et al in their 'crossed-field antenna', but surely the issues concerning a receiving antenna are different? Those issues, and an acute sensitivity to them, are evidently at the root of the misunderstanding here. The oversensitivity perhaps caused confusion, irritation, defensiveness, and temporary blurry vision. Scientists at the MIT Radiation labs during World War II found that it was a simple matter to measure E and H individually. I imagine that it is still possible to do without having to perform the miracle of 'field separation'. ac6xg |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Improve the Rec.Radio.Shortwave Newsgroup -by- Making On-Topic ... | Shortwave | |||
improve fm reception on transistor radio | Antenna | |||
5 Ways to Improve HD Radio Reception | Shortwave | |||
What are ferrite core chokes to improve radio reception? | Shortwave | |||
Realistic \ Radio Shack DX-200 improve audio mods | Shortwave |