On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 08:20:07 -0800, Jim Kelley
wrote:

Cecil Moore wrote:
Jim Kelley wrote:
The only current flowing on an antenna is the current traveling from
one end to the other.

Let's assume you are correct. Here are a few questions:

1. Given a 90 degree monopole fed against an infinite
ground plane, what would be the phase at the top of the
antenna compared to the phase at the feedpoint for any
instant in time?

2. Why would the feedpoint impedance of a 1/4WL monopole
be more than a magnitude less than the feedpoint impedance
of an infinite monopole?

3. Where does the above current go when it hits the open-
circuit at the top of the monopole?

4. Why is the total energy in the E-field at the top of the
monopole so high?

In what way are any of the questions relevant to, or deterministic of
the assumption?

Ah Jim!

You have the essence of Cecil's (r) Sub-optimal Conjugated Hypothesis
Information Transform before you, the SCHIT (c) model.

He has taken the ordinary postulate of current flow, conjugated it
into a new hypothesis through his sub-optimization. By removing
random bytes, it becomes more intelligible (I will take a stab at it
here):
1. a 90 degree monopole fed against an infinite ground plane
2. the feedpoint impedance of a 1/4WL monopole
3. current go[es]
4. the total energy
now makes perfect sense and whitens your teeth at the same time.

Returning to the process - through sub-optimization by adding
bafflegab, the future deconstruction (posts that would follow the one
above and for which I have already deconvoluted) would find Cecil
eventually unwinding the original conjugation, proving he was right by
proving you right - except you were wrong in what you "thought" (the
information transform) because he thought you were wrong.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Richard Clark wrote:
Returning to the process - through sub-optimization by adding
bafflegab, ...

As far as bafflegab goes, Richard, no one can hold a candle
to you. Your posting is a perfect example.
--
73, Cecil, IEEE, OOTC, http://www.w5dxp.com
"Government 'help' to business is just as disastrous as
government persecution..." Ayn Rand

On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 12:32:15 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote:

Richard Clark wrote:
Returning to the process - through sub-optimization by adding
bafflegab, ...

As far as bafflegab goes, Richard, no one can hold a candle
to you. Your posting is a perfect example.

You must be flattered (an example of information transformation) at
this imitation of you then (your comment here so unabashedly basking
in the intended conjugate of these congratulations).

[Gad this so easy, I should have gotten an AIG bonus for derivative
design!]
:-0

Richard Clark wrote:
You must be flattered (an example of information transformation) at
this imitation of you then (your comment here so unabashedly basking
in the intended conjugate of these congratulations).

Just send me some of what you are smoking and I will die happy. :-)
--
73, Cecil, IEEE, OOTC, http://www.w5dxp.com
"Government 'help' to business is just as disastrous as government
persecution..." Ayn Rand

On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:59:21 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote:

Richard Clark wrote:
You must be flattered (an example of information transformation) at
this imitation of you then (your comment here so unabashedly basking
in the intended conjugate of these congratulations).

Just send me some of what you are smoking and I will die happy. :-)

A double conjugation which reveals the source of this side thread.
Deconstructing the bafflegab by random byte dispersal gives us Cecil's
information transform:
what I am smoking isn't good enough.

[gad, this is so easy I could be double-dipping AIG bonuses and
getting favored IRS status too!]