Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
steveeh131047 wrote:
Roy, I've glanced at some of those references and it looks like there's years of "catch-up" reading for me ![]() It seems like the starting point for one of the earliest discussions was whether or not there is a variation in current amplitude along the length of a loading coil, with some pretty strong opinion saying that there isn't. I don't want to go over old ground, but perhaps you can give me a simple answer to this one question: When I use EZNEC to model a 6ft whip above a loading coil (40T, 6" diameter, 12" long), and look at the current distribution across the coil at the resonant frequency of the antenna (3.79 MHz), I see 1A at the base of the coil increasing to 1.07A at the centre of the coil and then dropping to 0.69A at the top of the coil. My question is: "Can I believe that I would see a similar current variation in the 'real world', or is this some failing of EZNEC to model the antenna properly?" Regards, Steve G3TXQ Yes, you would see this in the real world. EZNEC does a very good job of modeling a wire antenna with a loading coil, provided that you model the coil as a wire helix rather than lumped "load", and you can trust the results. As I've implied, a lumped load is quite a good model for a physically small, essentially non-radiating loading coil like a toroid on a magnetic core. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Dish Network "500" dish with two LNBs | Homebrew | |||
Kenwood reflector | General | |||
Vet. with a reflector | Antenna | |||
Reflector for Hammarlund | Boatanchors | |||
Reflector for Hammarlund | Boatanchors |