Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 23, 3:22*pm, Cecil Moore wrote:
Art Unwin wrote: You based your proof of a magnetic wave in a vacuum but it is an accelerating charge which obviously must have mass, that is radiation ala the particle. The accelerating charges are slow-moving electrons. The RF current moves at the speed of light in the (conductive) medium. Therefore, the RF current is associated with photons emitted by the electrons. Photons have zero rest mass and zero electric charge. Photons are the particles associated with RF waves. -- 73, Cecil, IEEE, OOTC, *http://www.w5dxp.com Cecil there you go again with the idea that zero mass and zero energy is something that can exist which some have termed as "photons" Point to the laws of nature that support that notion. At one time it was the same as a particle without mass. Presence science now state that particular particle does have mass which is why the World spent millions for the CERN project. Your technical expertise is built on the state of science 50 years ago and you are now building a castle on sand or excuses to justify your unwillingness to embrace change. It took 7 days to build the Universe by the initial expenditure of kinetic energy which embraces the laws of nature and the concept of a cycle or equilibrium. Remember the words" let there be light" which aligns with energy expenditure upon mass ie everything starts with the expenditure of energy upon or from mass it is not a chicken or egg analogy. And it is expenditure of energy upon mass that makes it a particle unconnected to all mass around it such that the particle is unbound and cannot be absorbed by another state. Lets face it, Adam and Eve knew nothing regarding equilibrium and the notion of frequency or period. All the work had been completed way belong that came upon the scene,, which is why religeon exists as the sole explanation of who and what was and is in charge with respect to the laws of nature. Again it is impossible for something to exist without mass. Art |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Art Unwin wrote:
Cecil there you go again with the idea that zero mass and zero energy is something that can exist which some have termed as "photons" Point to the laws of nature that support that notion. It's part of the standard model, Art, with which I am not about to disagree. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Model -- 73, Cecil, IEEE, OOTC, http://www.w5dxp.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Dish Network "500" dish with two LNBs | Homebrew | |||
Kenwood reflector | General | |||
Vet. with a reflector | Antenna | |||
Reflector for Hammarlund | Boatanchors | |||
Reflector for Hammarlund | Boatanchors |