Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Lux wrote:
Tom Donaly wrote: Finally, a modest question: if you have EZNEC, why would you be wasting time with something inferior? The gold standard is the gold standard. Perhaps more the silver or electrum standard. EZNEC doesn't do dielectric loading, for instance. (unless you get the Nec4 engine from Roy) And, it's a MoM code, so things not well represented by collections of wires aren't necessarily modeled well. Nothing is perfect, but which is better, EZNEC or the Cecil-Corum method of modeling antennas? 73, Tom Donaly, KA6RUH |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Dish Network "500" dish with two LNBs | Homebrew | |||
Kenwood reflector | General | |||
Vet. with a reflector | Antenna | |||
Reflector for Hammarlund | Boatanchors | |||
Reflector for Hammarlund | Boatanchors |