| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jim Kelley wrote:
Typically we wouldn't measure the amplitude of the standing wave envelope. That is where you are mistaken. The total current on a standing-wave antenna is primarily standing wave current. What you are saying is that we wouldn't typically measure the total current. On the contrary, total current is exactly what we would typically measure and is exactly what w7el measured. That's why he measured a negligible phase shift. We would make a measurement of either the forward or the reflected traveling wave, which are phase delayed along the antenna. I'm sorry, but that is a false statement. Measuring the forward or reflected traveling wave, which is less than 10% of the total energy on the antenna, is exactly what is the problem. Traveling waves on standing-wave antennas are very hard to separate and measure. Exactly how do you propose to separate the forward wave from the reflected wave while preserving the amplitude and phase of each? Hint: w7el used the total current for his "measurements". -- 73, Cecil, IEEE, OOTC, http://www.w5dxp.com |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Dish Network "500" dish with two LNBs | Homebrew | |||
| Kenwood reflector | General | |||
| Vet. with a reflector | Antenna | |||
| Reflector for Hammarlund | Boatanchors | |||
| Reflector for Hammarlund | Boatanchors | |||