"Richard Clark" wrote
...
On Fri, 15 May 2009 09:08:06 +0200, Szczepan Bia?ek
wrote:
Here is wrote that it happend:

Trash is what this reference is called. Someone's diary is not
science.

If it were not trash, it does not prove doubling. Did you actually
read it? It doesn't prove IMD either as there would be a billion
reports every day from the presence of the MegaWatt LW stations in
Europe. I don't suppose you listen to radio either?

Not all MegaWatt LW stations are the Hertz dipole. Such was in Warsow but
collapsed.

This is a ridiculous observation. However, if I were to allow it, it
thus also means that SOME MegaWatt LW stations are "the Hertz dipole,"
by your own admission (which is significantly in question as to be
authoritative because you don't really know, do you?).

If station has only one end no doubling. Even if it has two the lower must
have the same possibilities (tip top of mountain).

As SOME MegaWatt LW stations are "the Hertz dipole," it follows there
must be literally billions of examples of what you describe. And yet
you offer no personal experience, and the record is empty of others'
observations.

The others' obserwations were made in 1933 and a few next. Engineers are so
clever people that they very quickly found a remedy.

MythBusted = Trash and False.


But the main issue is not doubling.

Funny you would say that in a thread whose topic was your deliberate
choice.

Is the two: doubling and polarisation.
1. ""Over long distances, the atmosphere can cause the
polarization of a radio wave to fluctuate, so the distinction between
horizontal and vertical becomes less significant." From:
http://whatis.techtarget.com/definit...843762,00.html

2. It seems that at long distances should appear the phenomenon of frequency
doubling.

The common is "wave propagation"or more precise "are Radio Waves transverse
or longitudinal"?
What is your opinion?
S*