![]() |
What is the correlation between radio waves and cancer?
Jeff Liebermann wrote:
It's possible that brain cancer induced by RF exposure might work the same way. The IEEE Spectrum magazine reported the following: http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/40764.php -- 73, Cecil, IEEE, OOTC, http://www.w5dxp.com |
What is the correlation between radio waves and cancer?
|
What is the correlation between radio waves and cancer?
On Mon, 18 May 2009 06:24:56 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote: Jeff Liebermann wrote: It's possible that brain cancer induced by RF exposure might work the same way. The IEEE Spectrum magazine reported the following: http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/40764.php Yep. Using the NCI statistics I previously excavated, the incidence of new brain and CNS cases is about 6 cases per 100,000 population per year. The current population of Sweden is 9.2 million. Assuming the same cancer rate in Sweden as the US, that's 552 cases of brain cancer per year. Where did they find 905 brain cancer victims in a country that only generates 552 cases per year? Perhaps the numbers seem a bit odd? I haven't read the original report, but my guess(tm) the 240% higher risk is due to statistical anomalies resulting from using small samples culled from extremely small incidence rates. All it takes is one or two more events (cases), and the results look like 100% or 200% increases. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
What is the correlation between radio waves and cancer?
Jeff Liebermann wrote:
Where did they find 905 brain cancer victims in a country that only generates 552 cases per year? That's not the question. The question is: Where on earth did you get the idea that benign tumors and cancer are the same thing? Hint: They are not. -- 73, Cecil, IEEE, OOTC, http://www.w5dxp.com |
What is the correlation between radio waves and cancer?
On Mon, 18 May 2009 13:21:48 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote: Jeff Liebermann wrote: Where did they find 905 brain cancer victims in a country that only generates 552 cases per year? That's not the question. The question is: Where on earth did you get the idea that benign tumors and cancer are the same thing? Hint: They are not. Oops. You're right. The original question was about RF and cancer. I didn't notice that the Swedish study apparently (not sure without reading the study) includes both malignant and benign brain tumors. It may also not include CNS (central nervious system) tumors, which the ACI graph I presented does include. I couldn't find the article in question due to the vague references, but did manage to find another article on the same topic by the same author: "Symptoms Experienced in Connection with the Use of Digital and Analog Mobile Phones for Poeple Using Both Transmitter Systems: A Swedish-Norwegian Epidemiological Study." http://www.springerlink.com/content/k2k224/?p=414fd7433b85492a967c4624feddf2ca&pi=0 It appears to be part of the book "Wireless Phones and Health II". I also found a series of other articles dealing with RF exposure and medicine by Kjell Mild, but no source for the original article under "International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health". Incidentally, one of my neighbors recently had a brain tumor removed. She didn't use a cell phone prior to the diagnosis, but bought one so she could remain in contact during the treatment and recovery. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
What is the correlation between radio waves and cancer?
On Mon, 18 May 2009 16:38:21 GMT, Panzer240
wrote: MacaualyFlower wrote in news:eac83182-542b- : I know that there is some concern that cell phones may cause cancer. But is there any possible correlation between the radio waves we use to communicate, either by commercial radio or other sources and cancer? Or what about the radio waves that are being emitted from our personal electronic appliances? I have heard that there is some concern that if you live near a power line that you may be at risk for cancer. What is the state of research into this subject? Thanks Troll-o-meter 0--------------------------100 Pegged!!!! Caution! As a radio amateur I must be lucky if my neighbours don't claim headaches and nervous irritation the day after I put up my new antenna. Better keep oneself in good shape regarding the arguments. |
What is the correlation between radio waves and cancer?
Jeff Liebermann wrote:
Ok. That's closer than most of the off topic rubbish the pollutes most newsgroups. I can see you logic. After reading some of the postings in this newsgroup, I too might suspect that exposure to RF and antennas might produce insanity, illogic, political conservatism, and delusions of omniscience. . . The effect seems to peak at about 75 meter wavelength, with a minor peak at about 2 meters. The cautious and same amateur will avoid exposure to those wavelengths. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
What is the correlation between radio waves and cancer?
Roy Lewallen wrote:
The effect seems to peak at about 75 meter wavelength, with a minor peak at about 2 meters. The cautious and same amateur will avoid exposure to those wavelengths. I of course meant "sane" and not "same". My apology for the typo. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
What is the correlation between radio waves and cancer?
"Roy Lewallen" wrote in message line... Roy Lewallen wrote: The effect seems to peak at about 75 meter wavelength, with a minor peak at about 2 meters. The cautious and same amateur will avoid exposure to those wavelengths. I of course meant "sane" and not "same". My apology for the typo. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Of course, it is a given that the only truly sane band is six meters. Ed, AJ4PJ |
What is the correlation between radio waves and cancer?
On Tue, 19 May 2009 10:30:44 -0700, Roy Lewallen
wrote: Jeff Liebermann wrote: Ok. That's closer than most of the off topic rubbish the pollutes most newsgroups. I can see you logic. After reading some of the postings in this newsgroup, I too might suspect that exposure to RF and antennas might produce insanity, illogic, political conservatism, and delusions of omniscience. . . The effect seems to peak at about 75 meter wavelength, with a minor peak at about 2 meters. The cautious and same amateur will avoid exposure to those wavelengths. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Ham radio has its very own industry specific cancer called "cancer of the vocabulary". Upon over-exposure to RF, a fairly normal individual will soon develop symptoms which include ultra-long monologs, inserting "ahhhhh" between sentences, foaming at the mouth, phonetic alphabet creativity, and an apparently irresistible urge to eat microphones. An early indication of impending trouble is a tendency to identify oneself with a call sign after leaving a voicemail message. Advanced cases exhibit additional symptoms of language aberrations, political conservatism, compulsive knob twiddling, an insatiable desire to listen for intelligence in random white noise, a preference toward high wire acrobatics, and strangely coded speech. After several decades of RF exposure, the victim may show symptoms of pontification, pomposity, self-authority, and ossification of the technology. While not fatal, cancer of the vocabulary has been known to cause divorce, impoverishment, and curmudgeonificiation. Unfortunately, the symptoms are not reversible, even when the victim has withdrawn from ham radio for extended periods, such as to raise a family. Despite almost a century of historical data, little effort has been made to correlate RF exposure with cancer of the vocabulary. I suspect this may be due to the efforts of the ARRL to block such research. While it is obvious that different frequencies had different effects, it would be both interesting and useful if the connection were properly researched and documented. For example, it's apparent that exposure to low frequency (HF) waves causes a marked preference for noisy environments, the exact opposite effect is found after exposure to high frequencies (VHF), where signal clarity is preferred. This phenomenon and others should be investigated. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:49 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com