"mr1956" wrote in message
...
I am looking for some help developing a properly tuned piano wire
antenna for an all metal experimental rocket.
This particular vehicle currently uses a Digi International 9Xtream
100 mw transmitter which operates using Frequency Hopping Spread
Spectrum from 910 to 918 MHz.

The first flight used a .062" diameter length of piano wire cut so
that the exposed length was about 1/2 wavelength. The wire antenna was
isolated from the metal airfame with a small nylon penetrator and
connected to the transmitter via about a 12" length of RG-178 coax.
The coax was terminated at the antenna via two small jumpers (soldered
to the center conductor and shield). The shield was grounded on the
metal airframe transforming the entire rocket into an artificial
ground plane (the antenna was also swept back at about a 45 degree
angle to reduce drag.

During this first flight we observed a range of about 10 miles, about
half of the published range of this transmitter. The RF system is used
as a downlink for GPS data and we did not get a good radio link after
ignition until the rocket had descended to about 50,000 feet. Maximum
velocity was about Mach 3 which is why a conventional antenna cannot
be used as it will be melted by friction.

For the second version, we are thinking of using a slightly smaller
diameter piano wire for a 1/4 wave length antenna as I think this may
be more suitable for a system using an artificial ground plane. In
addition, I plan to terminate the RG-178 coax directly at the antenna
and seal it with potting compound. This new antenna will be mounted
totally on the exterior of the airframe and angled back only about 10
degrees to give a better radiation pattern.

However, I would really like to properly tune this new antenna and was
wondering if anyone in this group has any ideas as to how to do this.
Doing a tuned RCL circuit at this frequency is proving to be difficult
using discrete components, to say the least. I do not have an SWR, but
do have an RF millivolt meter as well as the means to measure the
capacitance between the antenna and metal airframe.

Any help will be appreciated as I would hate to fly this thing again
and not get it back because our RF downlink had insufficient range.

C. Newport

Hi C

Have you considered flush antennas, like slots?

Is is practical to use antenna directivity at the ground station to
increase the "range"?

It might be advantageous to use Linear Polarization on the rocket and
Circular Polarization on the ground.

For impedance measurement at L band, it is possible to build a slotted
line using plumbing supplies. That presumes that you already have access
to a signal generator and a detector to record the signal generator's
output.
A home built slotted line will have difficulty regestaring low VSWRs.
But, once it is known that the load impedance is close to the line impedance
(low VSWR), a directional coupler can be used to match more precisely.

I have built a "plumber's delight" slotted line that works well at 130
MHZ. The high quality directional couplers are affordable on eBay.
Note - If I can do it, it cant be too complicated!

Jerry KD6JDJ

On Sun, 24 May 2009 04:04:52 GMT, "Jerry"
wrote:

Have you considered flush antennas, like slots?

Slot antennas have the maximum lobe perpendicular to the rocket axis.
There's very little signal below the rocket. This is why tracking
stations are far away from the launch site. If the rocket were
overhead, and going straight up, there's no signal.

Slot antennas are also a power waste. You need 4 slots, run by a
power splitter, in order to insure that at least one antenna is
oriented in the direction of the receiver. Meanwhile, the other 3
slot antennas are radiating power to nobody in particular. Say goodby
to about 3/4th of your tx power. Receive sensitivity is not
affected.

--
Jeff Liebermann
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

"Jeff Liebermann" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 24 May 2009 04:04:52 GMT, "Jerry"
wrote:

Have you considered flush antennas, like slots?

Slot antennas have the maximum lobe perpendicular to the rocket axis.
There's very little signal below the rocket. This is why tracking
stations are far away from the launch site. If the rocket were
overhead, and going straight up, there's no signal.

Slot antennas are also a power waste. You need 4 slots, run by a
power splitter, in order to insure that at least one antenna is
oriented in the direction of the receiver. Meanwhile, the other 3
slot antennas are radiating power to nobody in particular. Say goodby
to about 3/4th of your tx power. Receive sensitivity is not
affected.

--
Jeff Liebermann
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

Hi Jeff

Why are you so negative?? I have designed and built lots of slot
antennas that were widely used on military aircraft. The efficiency is
quite good. I am sure a smart guy like you could design a slot antenna and
locate it for those guys with the 3G rocket. There hasnt been any text
that restricts where the slot could be located. As I read the original
post, they werent receiving signal from the accending rocket. Maybe they
only want to receive data that was recorded after the rocket reached it's
peak. There are lots of information that you and I dont yet know. But,
my major question for you is "Why are you so negative?".

Jerry KD6JDJ

On Sun, 24 May 2009 07:30:03 GMT, "Jerry"
wrote:


"Jeff Liebermann" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 24 May 2009 04:04:52 GMT, "Jerry"
wrote:

Have you considered flush antennas, like slots?

Slot antennas have the maximum lobe perpendicular to the rocket axis.
There's very little signal below the rocket. This is why tracking
stations are far away from the launch site. If the rocket were
overhead, and going straight up, there's no signal.

Slot antennas are also a power waste. You need 4 slots, run by a
power splitter, in order to insure that at least one antenna is
oriented in the direction of the receiver. Meanwhile, the other 3
slot antennas are radiating power to nobody in particular. Say goodby
to about 3/4th of your tx power. Receive sensitivity is not
affected.

Hi Jeff
Why are you so negative?? I have designed and built lots of slot
antennas that were widely used on military aircraft. The efficiency is
quite good. I am sure a smart guy like you could design a slot antenna and
locate it for those guys with the 3G rocket. There hasnt been any text
that restricts where the slot could be located. As I read the original
post, they werent receiving signal from the accending rocket. Maybe they
only want to receive data that was recorded after the rocket reached it's
peak. There are lots of information that you and I dont yet know. But,
my major question for you is "Why are you so negative?".
Jerry KD6JDJ

I don't think I'm being particularly negative or offensive. I offered
what I consider to be a more reasonable alternative (CP turnstile
antenna) and ran the path loss calculations to insure that it would
work. I also itemized why a slot antenna would be an inferior
solution. My main point is that with a vertically ascending rocket,
the antenna pattern should be primarily ahead and behind the rocket,
not perpendicular.

I've seen one paper design that used insulated fins for the 4
turnstile antenna elements. However, I haven't seen the actual
rocket. I also built a 2.4GHz antenna system for a model airplane for
a video downlink. The initial design was a slot antenna system in the
fuselage, which worked great when the aircraft was overhead, but did
badly when near the horizon and out of the antenna pattern. Two
vertical monopoles and a power splitter did much better, especially
since it worked well in inverted flight. I must admit that I haven't
designed a slot antenna system for a high power Mach 3 rocket. I did
build a small "G" motor rocket without telemetry but that doesn't
count for much.

Anyway, we're both guessing. Without a clue as to the size, geometry,
and construction of the rocket, the configuration of the ground
station antenna, the location of the ground station, and the
approximate trajectory (probably straight up), we can only speculate
as to the optimal design. My guess is that this a level 1 rocket with
an "H" or "I" motor which could barely tolerate the slight increase in
diameter required for multiple slot antnnas. Wire or fin antennas
don't add anything.


--
Jeff Liebermann
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Sun, 24 May 2009 04:04:52 GMT, "Jerry"
wrote:

Have you considered flush antennas, like slots?

Slot antennas have the maximum lobe perpendicular to the rocket axis.
There's very little signal below the rocket. This is why tracking
stations are far away from the launch site. If the rocket were
overhead, and going straight up, there's no signal.

That was my first thought on side mounted antennas.

The best solution would be something on the fins if that were
possible with the airframe design.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

On May 24, 12:04*am, "Jerry" wrote:
"mr1956" wrote in message

...



I am looking for some help developing a properly tuned piano wire
antenna for an all metal experimental rocket.
This particular vehicle currently uses a Digi International 9Xtream
100 mw transmitter which operates using Frequency Hopping Spread
Spectrum from 910 to 918 MHz.

The first flight used a .062" diameter length of piano wire cut so
that the exposed length was about 1/2 wavelength. The wire antenna was
isolated from the metal airfame with a small nylon penetrator and
connected to the transmitter via about a 12" length of RG-178 coax.
The coax was terminated at the antenna via two small jumpers (soldered
to the center conductor and shield). *The shield was grounded on the
metal airframe transforming the entire rocket into an artificial
ground plane (the antenna was also swept back at about a 45 degree
angle to reduce drag.

During this first flight we observed a range of about 10 miles, about
half of the published range of this transmitter. The RF system is used
as a downlink for GPS data and we did not get a good radio link after
ignition until the rocket had descended to about 50,000 feet. *Maximum
velocity was about Mach 3 which is why a conventional antenna cannot
be used as it will be melted by friction.

For the second version, we are thinking of using a slightly smaller
diameter piano wire for a 1/4 wave length antenna as I think this may
be more suitable for a system using an artificial ground plane. *In
addition, I plan to terminate the RG-178 coax directly at the antenna
and seal it with potting compound. This new antenna will be mounted
totally on the exterior of the airframe and angled back only about 10
degrees to give a better radiation pattern.

However, I would really like to properly tune this new antenna and was
wondering if anyone in this group has any ideas as to how to do this.
Doing a tuned RCL circuit at this frequency is proving to be difficult
using discrete components, to say the least. I do not have an SWR, but
do have an RF millivolt meter as well as the means to measure the
capacitance between the antenna and metal airframe.

Any help will be appreciated as I would hate to fly this thing again
and not get it back because our RF downlink had insufficient range.

C. Newport

* Hi C

* Have you considered flush antennas, like slots?

* Is is practical to use antenna directivity at the ground station to
increase the "range"?

* It might be advantageous to use Linear Polarization on the rocket and
Circular Polarization on the ground.

* For impedance measurement at L band, it is possible to build a slotted
line using plumbing supplies. * That presumes that you already have access
to a signal generator and a detector to record the signal generator's
output.
* A home built slotted line will have difficulty regestaring low VSWRs.
But, once it is known that the load impedance is close to the line impedance
(low VSWR), a directional coupler can be used to match more precisely.

* I have built a "plumber's delight" slotted line that works well at 130
MHZ. * The high quality directional couplers are affordable on eBay.
* Note - If I can do it, it cant be too complicated!

* * * * * * * * * * * * Jerry * KD6JDJ
I have looked at slotted or flush wrap around antennas but integrating
one into the existing design would be difficult due to the wall
thickness of the metal. Something like that would have to be mounted
flush and I would be worried about the wind blast peeling the thing
off. Certainly, there is much that can be done but I am unfortunately
not Wallops Island and have limited resources like anyone else.

"mr1956" wrote in message
...
On May 24, 12:04 am, "Jerry" wrote:
"mr1956" wrote in message

...



I am looking for some help developing a properly tuned piano wire
antenna for an all metal experimental rocket.
This particular vehicle currently uses a Digi International 9Xtream
100 mw transmitter which operates using Frequency Hopping Spread
Spectrum from 910 to 918 MHz.

The first flight used a .062" diameter length of piano wire cut so
that the exposed length was about 1/2 wavelength. The wire antenna was
isolated from the metal airfame with a small nylon penetrator and
connected to the transmitter via about a 12" length of RG-178 coax.
The coax was terminated at the antenna via two small jumpers (soldered
to the center conductor and shield). The shield was grounded on the
metal airframe transforming the entire rocket into an artificial
ground plane (the antenna was also swept back at about a 45 degree
angle to reduce drag.

During this first flight we observed a range of about 10 miles, about
half of the published range of this transmitter. The RF system is used
as a downlink for GPS data and we did not get a good radio link after
ignition until the rocket had descended to about 50,000 feet. Maximum
velocity was about Mach 3 which is why a conventional antenna cannot
be used as it will be melted by friction.

For the second version, we are thinking of using a slightly smaller
diameter piano wire for a 1/4 wave length antenna as I think this may
be more suitable for a system using an artificial ground plane. In
addition, I plan to terminate the RG-178 coax directly at the antenna
and seal it with potting compound. This new antenna will be mounted
totally on the exterior of the airframe and angled back only about 10
degrees to give a better radiation pattern.

However, I would really like to properly tune this new antenna and was
wondering if anyone in this group has any ideas as to how to do this.
Doing a tuned RCL circuit at this frequency is proving to be difficult
using discrete components, to say the least. I do not have an SWR, but
do have an RF millivolt meter as well as the means to measure the
capacitance between the antenna and metal airframe.

Any help will be appreciated as I would hate to fly this thing again
and not get it back because our RF downlink had insufficient range.

C. Newport

Hi C

Have you considered flush antennas, like slots?

Is is practical to use antenna directivity at the ground station to
increase the "range"?

It might be advantageous to use Linear Polarization on the rocket and
Circular Polarization on the ground.

For impedance measurement at L band, it is possible to build a slotted
line using plumbing supplies. That presumes that you already have access
to a signal generator and a detector to record the signal generator's
output.
A home built slotted line will have difficulty regestaring low VSWRs.
But, once it is known that the load impedance is close to the line
impedance
(low VSWR), a directional coupler can be used to match more precisely.

I have built a "plumber's delight" slotted line that works well at 130
MHZ. The high quality directional couplers are affordable on eBay.
Note - If I can do it, it cant be too complicated!

Jerry KD6JDJ
I have looked at slotted or flush wrap around antennas but integrating
one into the existing design would be difficult due to the wall
thickness of the metal. Something like that would have to be mounted
flush and I would be worried about the wind blast peeling the thing
off. Certainly, there is much that can be done but I am unfortunately
not Wallops Island and have limited resources like anyone else.


Hi C

It looks like your "wire" antenna might actually be OK for your project.
You have demonstrated that it works when the rocket is nearly 10 miles away
when you hoped for 20 miles. Evidently, the antenna doesnt need to
function while the rocket is accending.
Are you able to improve the ground based antenna The equipment you now
have would need only 6 dB improvement to provide the 20 mile range.
I'd like to know more about your ground based antenna system.

Jerry KD6JDJ (who has lots of small
diameterTeflon dielectric coax to donate to a real project)

On May 24, 9:48*am, "Jerry" wrote:
"mr1956" wrote in message

...
On May 24, 12:04 am, "Jerry" wrote:

"mr1956" wrote in message

....

I am looking for some help developing a properly tuned piano wire
antenna for an all metal experimental rocket.
This particular vehicle currently uses a Digi International 9Xtream
100 mw transmitter which operates using Frequency Hopping Spread
Spectrum from 910 to 918 MHz.

The first flight used a .062" diameter length of piano wire cut so
that the exposed length was about 1/2 wavelength. The wire antenna was
isolated from the metal airfame with a small nylon penetrator and
connected to the transmitter via about a 12" length of RG-178 coax.
The coax was terminated at the antenna via two small jumpers (soldered
to the center conductor and shield). The shield was grounded on the
metal airframe transforming the entire rocket into an artificial
ground plane (the antenna was also swept back at about a 45 degree
angle to reduce drag.

During this first flight we observed a range of about 10 miles, about
half of the published range of this transmitter. The RF system is used
as a downlink for GPS data and we did not get a good radio link after
ignition until the rocket had descended to about 50,000 feet. Maximum
velocity was about Mach 3 which is why a conventional antenna cannot
be used as it will be melted by friction.

For the second version, we are thinking of using a slightly smaller
diameter piano wire for a 1/4 wave length antenna as I think this may
be more suitable for a system using an artificial ground plane. In
addition, I plan to terminate the RG-178 coax directly at the antenna
and seal it with potting compound. This new antenna will be mounted
totally on the exterior of the airframe and angled back only about 10
degrees to give a better radiation pattern.

However, I would really like to properly tune this new antenna and was
wondering if anyone in this group has any ideas as to how to do this.
Doing a tuned RCL circuit at this frequency is proving to be difficult
using discrete components, to say the least. I do not have an SWR, but
do have an RF millivolt meter as well as the means to measure the
capacitance between the antenna and metal airframe.

Any help will be appreciated as I would hate to fly this thing again
and not get it back because our RF downlink had insufficient range.

C. Newport

Hi C

Have you considered flush antennas, like slots?

Is is practical to use antenna directivity at the ground station to
increase the "range"?

It might be advantageous to use Linear Polarization on the rocket and
Circular Polarization on the ground.

For impedance measurement at L band, it is possible to build a slotted
line using plumbing supplies. That presumes that you already have access
to a signal generator and a detector to record the signal generator's
output.
A home built slotted line will have difficulty regestaring low VSWRs.
But, once it is known that the load impedance is close to the line
impedance
(low VSWR), a directional coupler can be used to match more precisely.

I have built a "plumber's delight" slotted line that works well at 130
MHZ. The high quality directional couplers are affordable on eBay.
Note - If I can do it, it cant be too complicated!

Jerry KD6JDJ

I have looked at slotted or flush wrap around antennas but integrating
one into the existing design would be difficult due to the wall
thickness of the metal. Something like that would have to be mounted
flush and I would be worried about the wind blast peeling the thing
off. *Certainly, there is much that can be done but I am unfortunately
not Wallops Island and have limited resources like anyone else.

* Hi C

* It looks like your "wire" antenna might actually be OK for your project.
You have demonstrated that it works when the rocket is nearly 10 miles away
when you hoped for 20 miles. * Evidently, the antenna doesnt need to
function while the rocket is accending.
* Are you able to improve the ground based antenna * The equipment you now
have would need only 6 dB improvement to provide the 20 mile range.
* I'd like to know more about your ground based antenna system.

* * * * * * * * * * * * *Jerry * *KD6JDJ * * *(who has lots of small
diameterTeflon dielectric coax *to donate to a real project)

Jerry:

The "ground station" is not much; just a small receiver with a
standard 1/2 wave dipole attached using an sma connector. The
receiver is battery powered and connected to a laptop using a standard
serial cable. We had thought about using a Yagi during the previous
flight but it just got left by the wayside with everything else that
had to be done.

The basic telemetry and downlink system is manufactured by Ozark
Aerospace (Erik Hall) but uses a Digi Int. 9Xstream radio modem
(www.ozarkaerospace.com and I use the ARTS TX-900G and RX-900). I
actually built my own transmitter and GPS system using a 5 watt data
radio and Garmin GPS with a small Li-Ion battery pack. But that system
was "lost" during a not so successful flight in Texas a few years ago.
Hence, for this design I opted to buy something off the shelf that
already worked.

Most people using this system have fiberglass airframes so for them it
is a simple matter to use a commercially available antenna mounted
inside of the airfame. But this is an all metal design so I had the
telemetry board made so I could connect my own antenna. FYI, the
rocket is 15 feet long, 6" in diameter and weighs over 100 lbs empty
and close to 200 lbs. on the pad. It is all aluminum, except for the
nose cone which is laminated birch. I'm using metal for the airframe
because it just easier to work with and the first 8 feet of the rocket
is metal anyway as that is the motor case.

The published range for this Digi Int. transmitter is 20 miles, though
people doing amateur high-altitude balloon flights have reportedly
observed even better reception from high altitudes (i.e., over 80 K
feet). This rocket did about 85,000 feet last September at Black Rock,
Nevada so it is doubtful that we will get GPS data at apogee anyway
due to the COTS limitations. But I'd like to get as much as possible
and will probably eventually convert to the 9Xtend modem which goes up
to one watt xmit power.

Curt

Hi C

It looks like your "wire" antenna might actually be OK for your project.
You have demonstrated that it works when the rocket is nearly 10 miles
away
when you hoped for 20 miles. Evidently, the antenna doesnt need to
function while the rocket is accending.
Are you able to improve the ground based antenna The equipment you now
have would need only 6 dB improvement to provide the 20 mile range.
I'd like to know more about your ground based antenna system.

Jerry KD6JDJ (who has lots of small
diameterTeflon dielectric coax to donate to a real project)

Jerry:

The "ground station" is not much; just a small receiver with a
standard 1/2 wave dipole attached using an sma connector. The
receiver is battery powered and connected to a laptop using a standard
serial cable. We had thought about using a Yagi during the previous
flight but it just got left by the wayside with everything else that
had to be done.

The basic telemetry and downlink system is manufactured by Ozark
Aerospace (Erik Hall) but uses a Digi Int. 9Xstream radio modem
(www.ozarkaerospace.com and I use the ARTS TX-900G and RX-900). I
actually built my own transmitter and GPS system using a 5 watt data
radio and Garmin GPS with a small Li-Ion battery pack. But that system
was "lost" during a not so successful flight in Texas a few years ago.
Hence, for this design I opted to buy something off the shelf that
already worked.

Most people using this system have fiberglass airframes so for them it
is a simple matter to use a commercially available antenna mounted
inside of the airfame. But this is an all metal design so I had the
telemetry board made so I could connect my own antenna. FYI, the
rocket is 15 feet long, 6" in diameter and weighs over 100 lbs empty
and close to 200 lbs. on the pad. It is all aluminum, except for the
nose cone which is laminated birch. I'm using metal for the airframe
because it just easier to work with and the first 8 feet of the rocket
is metal anyway as that is the motor case.

The published range for this Digi Int. transmitter is 20 miles, though
people doing amateur high-altitude balloon flights have reportedly
observed even better reception from high altitudes (i.e., over 80 K
feet). This rocket did about 85,000 feet last September at Black Rock,
Nevada so it is doubtful that we will get GPS data at apogee anyway
due to the COTS limitations. But I'd like to get as much as possible
and will probably eventually convert to the 9Xtend modem which goes up
to one watt xmit power.

Curt

Hi Curt

I strongly suspect that you can use the antenna you now have on the
rocket. There is a possibility that you hadnt optimized the pointing of the
stub on the base station. You might be able to get enough system gain by
using a simple Turnstile Antenna at the ground station ( Wikipedia ).
If you decide you want more signal than you get with a Turnstile, it would
be easy to build a 900 MHz Helix or Crossed Yagii.
It seems very important to use a Circularly Polarized antenna at the
ground station.

Jerry

On May 24, 2:59*pm, "Jerry" wrote:
Hi C

It looks like your "wire" antenna might actually be OK for your project..
You have demonstrated that it works when the rocket is nearly 10 miles
away
when you hoped for 20 miles. Evidently, the antenna doesnt need to
function while the rocket is accending.
Are you able to improve the ground based antenna The equipment you now
have would need only 6 dB improvement to provide the 20 mile range.
I'd like to know more about your ground based antenna system.

Jerry KD6JDJ (who has lots of small
diameterTeflon dielectric coax to donate to a real project)

Jerry:

The "ground station" is not much; just a small receiver with a
standard 1/2 wave dipole attached using an sma connector. *The
receiver is battery powered and connected to a laptop using a standard
serial cable. We had thought about using a Yagi during the previous
flight but it just got left by the wayside with everything else that
had to be done.

The basic telemetry and downlink system is manufactured by Ozark
Aerospace (Erik Hall) but uses a Digi Int. 9Xstream radio modem
(www.ozarkaerospace.comand I use the ARTS TX-900G and RX-900). *I
actually built my own transmitter and GPS system using a 5 watt data
radio and Garmin GPS with a small Li-Ion battery pack. But that system
was "lost" during a not so successful flight in Texas a few years ago.
Hence, for this design I opted to buy something off the shelf that
already worked.

Most people using this system have fiberglass airframes so for them it
is a simple matter to use a commercially available antenna mounted
inside of the airfame. But this is an all metal design so I had the
telemetry board made so I could connect my own antenna. FYI, the
rocket is 15 feet long, 6" in diameter and weighs over 100 lbs empty
and close to 200 lbs. on the pad. It is all aluminum, except for the
nose cone which is laminated birch. I'm using metal for the airframe
because it just easier to work with and the first 8 feet of the rocket
is metal anyway as that is the motor case.

The published range for this Digi Int. transmitter is 20 miles, though
people doing amateur high-altitude balloon flights have reportedly
observed even better reception from high altitudes (i.e., over 80 K
feet). This rocket did about 85,000 feet last September at Black Rock,
Nevada so it is doubtful that we will get GPS data at apogee anyway
due to the COTS limitations. But I'd like to get as much as possible
and will probably eventually convert to the 9Xtend modem which goes up
to one watt xmit power.

Curt

* Hi Curt

* I strongly suspect that you can use the antenna you now have on the
rocket. *There is a possibility that you hadnt optimized the pointing of the
stub on the base station. *You might be able to get enough system gain by
using a simple Turnstile Antenna at the ground station ( Wikipedia ).
* If you decide you want more signal than you get with a Turnstile, it would
be easy to build a 900 MHz Helix or Crossed Yagii.
* It seems very important to use a Circularly Polarized antenna at the
ground station.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * Jerry

I am familiar with the Helix antenna and the Yagi, but not a "crossed
yagi." Am I correct in assuming that the crossed yagi is simply two
yagis with the reflectors at right angles to each other (so that it
looks like a cross when viewed from the end)?

Directionality on the ground station is an issue though. Once the
rocket goes out of sight (it was only visible for about three seconds
of a nine minute flight), pointing the receiving antenna in the right
direction and elevation would be guess work. I know that the yagi must
be much more directional than the 1/2 wave dipole used before but how
much I do not know. I would imagine it is determined by the number and
spacing of the elements. I also think that having the transmitting
antenna more perpendicular to the airfame will help during apogee and
descent.

Curt