"Richard Clark" wrote in message
news
On Sat, 30 May 2009 18:43:45 +0200, Szczepan Bia?ek
wrote:
"Dave" wrote
.. .
both, and neither,
which part radiate the radio waves.

I can see a struggle developing here between you and Art as to who has
the claim to wear the cap and bells.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

I think Szczepan can take Art in best out of three falls. Neither seems to
have an interest in real world antennas. Perhaps there is a
rec.radio.magicalphysics group they could move to?

Dale W4OP

Dale Parfitt wrote:

"Richard Clark" wrote in message
news
On Sat, 30 May 2009 18:43:45 +0200, Szczepan Bia?ek
wrote:
"Dave" wrote
. ..
both, and neither,
which part radiate the radio waves.

I can see a struggle developing here between you and Art as to who has
the claim to wear the cap and bells.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

I think Szczepan can take Art in best out of three falls. Neither seems to
have an interest in real world antennas. Perhaps there is a
rec.radio.magicalphysics group they could move to?

Dale W4OP

alt.support.alzheimers

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

On May 30, 1:55*pm, "Dale Parfitt" wrote:
"Richard Clark" wrote in message

news
On Sat, 30 May 2009 18:43:45 +0200, Szczepan Bia?ek
wrote:
"Dave" wrote
.. .
both, and neither,
which part radiate the radio waves.

I can see a struggle developing here between you and Art as to who has
the claim to wear the cap and bells.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

I think Szczepan can take Art in best out of three falls. Neither seems to
have an interest in real world antennas. Perhaps there is a
rec.radio.magicalphysics group they could move to?

Dale W4OP

Heh I just want you all to keep posting regarding your knowledge of
antennas. The more you post the more you reveal yourselves. I was a
mechanical engineer not a antenna or electrical engineer so I am
struggling just to get on the ladder of knowledge. There are a few
here that feel they are best qualified to judge with respect to
antennas. I just can't make them out. Now we have Tom competing for
the top spot because he has made antennas to work and is anxious to
let everybody know about it Yup 98% efficient he states
That 98% of radiation that went to the wrong place.What has he
accomplished that nobody else has done Now where did that other 2% go
possibly hiding inside the radiator tube? Has he accounted for a
everything involved in the generation of radiation? Does he know what
radiation is and what creates it? Now will somebody explain to me why
the subject
of waves keep coming up when radiation is discussed and do the waves
tip over when they get to their destination and dump dots and dashes
all over the place? Every body is keeping mum as to what creates
radiation because none can answer the question They only can ask
questions to divert the spot light else where. Perhaps the "tide" has
turned with respect to Maxwell and it is time to surf the "waves"!

"Art Unwin" wrote in message
...
I think Szczepan can take Art in best out of three falls. Neither seems
to
have an interest in real world antennas. Perhaps there is a
rec.radio.magicalphysics group they could move to?

not even close, art has him for crackpot theories hands down.

Every body is keeping mum as to what creates
radiation because none can answer the question.

you haven't asked that question, you have stated your theory about magical
levitating anti-diamagnetic neutrinos. according to Maxwell's equations as
supported by detailed observations and calculations over the last 100 years
or more, accelerating charges create radiation.

Art Unwin wrote:
antennas. I just can't make them out. Now we have Tom competing for
the top spot because he has made antennas to work and is anxious to

Me? Compete with people like the Richards, or Roy or the late great
Cebik or any other of the other real pros here? Nonsense. Not even trying.

You are amusing in a kind of Lewis Carroll way. So don't stop. But
don't think the criticism will either, because you are just plain wrong.

tom
K0TAR

On May 30, 9:20*pm, tom wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
antennas. I just can't make them out. Now we have Tom competing for
the top spot because he has made antennas to work and is anxious to

Me? Compete with people like the Richards, or Roy or the late great
Cebik or any other of the other real pros here? *Nonsense. *Not even trying.

You are amusing in a kind of Lewis Carroll way. *So don't stop. *But
don't think the criticism will either, because you are just plain wrong.

tom
K0TAR

Then quit judging people

Art Unwin wrote:
On May 30, 9:20 pm, tom wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
antennas. I just can't make them out. Now we have Tom competing for
the top spot because he has made antennas to work and is anxious to
Me? Compete with people like the Richards, or Roy or the late great
Cebik or any other of the other real pros here? Nonsense. Not even trying.

You are amusing in a kind of Lewis Carroll way. So don't stop. But
don't think the criticism will either, because you are just plain wrong.

tom
K0TAR

Then quit judging people

Engineers get to judge. It's part of our job. It's why eventually we
learn enough make buildings and bridges that don't fall down.

And it's why we don't allow people like you design things that need to work.

That's the way it is. You may not like it, but that's just too bad.

tom
K0TAR

On May 30, 9:20*pm, tom wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
antennas. I just can't make them out. Now we have Tom competing for
the top spot because he has made antennas to work and is anxious to

Me? Compete with people like the Richards, or Roy or the late great
Cebik or any other of the other real pros here? *Nonsense. *Not even trying.

You are amusing in a kind of Lewis Carroll way. *So don't stop. *But
don't think the criticism will either, because you are just plain wrong.

tom
K0TAR

Nobody has proved that

Art Unwin wrote:
On May 30, 9:20 pm, tom wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
antennas. I just can't make them out. Now we have Tom competing for
the top spot because he has made antennas to work and is anxious to
Me? Compete with people like the Richards, or Roy or the late great
Cebik or any other of the other real pros here? Nonsense. Not even trying.

You are amusing in a kind of Lewis Carroll way. So don't stop. But
don't think the criticism will either, because you are just plain wrong.

tom
K0TAR

Nobody has proved that

No, you haven't proved anything. That's the way science works. We don't
have to prove you wrong, you have to prove that you are right.

You seem to have missed that part.

Be specific. Give detailed test conditions. Give exact design
specifications of the test antennas. Give detailed results of your test
measurements. Then someone else can confirm your results or not.

Are you afraid your antennas don't really work? You certainly could
prove prior art if they do. You've been claiming they do for long enough.

Quit hiding behind words and give concrete things that can be tested.

S--t or get off the pot.

tom
K0TAR


tom
K0TAR

tom wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
On May 30, 9:20 pm, tom wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
antennas. I just can't make them out. Now we have Tom competing for
the top spot because he has made antennas to work and is anxious to
Me? Compete with people like the Richards, or Roy or the late great
Cebik or any other of the other real pros here? Nonsense. Not even
trying.

You are amusing in a kind of Lewis Carroll way. So don't stop. But
don't think the criticism will either, because you are just plain wrong.

tom
K0TAR

Nobody has proved that

No, you haven't proved anything. That's the way science works. We don't
have to prove you wrong, you have to prove that you are right.

You seem to have missed that part.

Be specific. Give detailed test conditions. Give exact design
specifications of the test antennas. Give detailed results of your test
measurements. Then someone else can confirm your results or not.

Are you afraid your antennas don't really work? You certainly could
prove prior art if they do. You've been claiming they do for long enough.

Quit hiding behind words and give concrete things that can be tested.

S--t or get off the pot.

tom
K0TAR

HELLO?

tom
K0TAR