Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
... On Jun 10, 11:15 am, Jim Lux wrote: given the complexity of rotators in general, rigging up two crossed dipoles and a switch might be a better solution. Don't even need the switch.. Just feed the crossed dipoles with a single coax line and off to the races. ![]() Truly. I just hung 40m from 80m wire with some spreaders. If I had more wire I would add a couple more at 80m just for bandwidth. I doubt that 6 and 10 meter cause any interaction with a common feed. At that size a rotatable dipole is easily made with mobile whips. A rotatable dipole takes advantage of the deep nulls. A dipole with 120 degrees included angle is just a droopy dipole. An inverted V with 90 degrees included angle or less has a combination of vertical and horizontal components to its radiation and is more omnidirectional. More so with a metal supporting mast. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Toroid coil turns calc | Homebrew |