Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... On Jun 10, 3:36?pm, "Kash J. Rangan" wrote: Is it advisable to use a combination of Coax and a ladder line to feed a simple horizontal multiband dipole antenna? In my new QTH it would be very easy for me to get a short run of coax out of my shack window but I would like to use a low loss ladder line for the main run up to the antenna feed point. Is it OK to place a 4:1 balun just outside of the window ?for the transition? Kash, AG4EL The G5RV antenna uses a combination of coax and ladder line, so this type of antenna is in use by 1000's of Hams. The 4:1 balun is a bad idea for a multiband antenna, due to the impedances involved at the various operating frequencies. Just transistion from the ladder line to the coax and use a 1:1 choke balun at the antenna input of your tuner. You did not mention an antenna tuner, but you will need one for multiband operation. In general keep the coax length as short as possible. Gary N4AST Another thing to consider is that the length of the 450/300 ohm twinlead feedline is an important factor when considering the operational bandwidth of said "dipole" antenna (it's only a dipole when operated at its resonant length). The twinlead is utilized as part of the radiating system when operated on certain bands. This unusual impedance is why the tuner is needed. Shortening the twinlead and using more coax limits this antenna's ability to operate over wide frequency ranges. My Van Gordan All Bander's twinlead enters my shack and then connects to a balun, which is then fed by coax that is connected to my MFJ-989C tuner. I can often tune down into the 160 meter band using this setup, though I wish my twinlead feedline length was a bit longer for even greater tuning flexibility. By the way, my All Bander also works great on six meters. Ed, AJ4PJ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|