| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Jul 14, 9:55*pm, wrote:
Hi - I need to receive VHF TV (channels 6,7,9,13) and would like to make a super-duper antenna for inside my attic. *I would have thought that I could easily find (simple) instructions on the internet but can't. *Does anybody have a simple idea that just uses wire (wire should be easy to attach in an attic). I've seen some instructions (mostly UHF or DTV) and some of them do calculations for wavelength (let's say 5 feet). *And then, with no explanation, the guy just says "I made it 10 feet for better reception". *So I ask, can I not then just use the entire length of my attic for super-duper reception? *Wire is cheap after all, and I only want to crawl up there once. I don;t have a PhD in antenna making, so a lot of the instructions/ terms don't mean much to me (dipole, balun, etc). *I'm hoping for instructions such as: 1. Cut a piece of 18gauge coppr wire 5 feet long 2. attach one end to a rafter. 3. solder the other end to the centre wire of the coax 4 insert tab A into slot B etc etc. Also, I see instructions that say you should aim the antenna without defining "aim". *Do you allign the wire in the direction of the transmission antenna, or should the wire by perpendicular? Thanks Just saw this thread and some very good suggestions. One thought. Unless your close to the TV Transmitters, stay away from using wire as the antenna. There is a good reason antennas are made of tubes, not wire. At high frequency, like television transmission frequencies, the current creates a repulsion field that pushes the current away from the center of the conductor. In other words, all the current travels on the outside surface of the wire. Look up the term, "skin depth". At frequencies as low as 20MHz, more than 99% of the current will be within 3 mils of the surface. The only easy way to lower the losses in the antenna is to use large diameter conductors, but since the inside of the conductor carries no current, you don't need metal there, so it is ok to use hollow tubes. Antenna manufacturers save themselves money by lowering material costs and shipping weight. They use hollow tubes. If you don't care about weight or material cost, go ahead and use solid rods, 1/4 inch, or even 3/8, but stay away from 18 Awg, way too small. One other thing, nature abhors sharp edges, that's why bubbles are round, so don't use square tubes or sharp bar stock either. Use rounded tubes or rods. Even smoothing and polishing the surface lowers the resistance. When you're done, passivate the surface of the conductors to prevent corrosion over time. [meaning: paint the antenna] Over time, corrosion will deteriorate your antenna's performance. Rounded surfaces also means make your connections smooth with nice transitions. As in, "if it looks good, it works good." You can use aluminum if the lengths are continuous and/or you make connections using constant mechanical pressure, like a "lots of teeth" star washer that has bitten down through the insulating oxide layer held with a bolt. All in all, it seems a lot easier to buy a fringe field antenna and put that in your attic. But if you do it yourself, hope you're successful, document what you built, and share it here. Robert |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Antenna in the Attic | CB | |||
| Intuitively {To My Way of Thinking} for an In-the-Attic Antenna the Horizontal [Flat] Loop Antenna offers these Benefits : | Shortwave | |||
| Attic antenna not doing much | CB | |||
| Attic Antenna help? | Shortwave | |||
| Attic antenna | Antenna | |||