| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Aug 10, 6:29*am, Bob Bob wrote:
Jeff/Art Keep in mind too that cross polarized (circular) point to point links (ie with a CP ant at each end) suffer from odd reflection attenuation (ie the polarization sense gets reversed by reflection) In 70cm UHF experiments I did back in the 80's I found out that a horiz-horiz system (base to mobile) outperformed a circular-circular by at least 12dB when moving. This wasnt actually the base reason for the experiments so I didnt make accurate measurements. OT Art, but I hope interesting. How random is the propogated linear antenna HF wave polarization and does it vary much with single hop and/or high angle? That might be a starting point for determining how useful CP on HF might be. Tnxs for the link Jeff. Cheers Bob VK2YQA Jeff Liebermann wrote: On Sun, 9 Aug 2009 21:24:01 -0700 (PDT), Art Unwin wrote: The majority of antennas used today are (commercial) circularly polarized What stands out for me is the audio improvement. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Circular polarization... does it have to be synchronous?? | Antenna | |||
| Quad and circular polarization | Antenna | |||
| Mixing high side versus low side and (f1 - f2) versus (f1 + f2) | Homebrew | |||
| Circular vs. Linear and Dipole vs. Loop. Thoughts? | Antenna | |||
| Circular V.S. Vertical antenna polarization ! | Broadcasting | |||