Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Art Unwin" wrote in message ... The majority of antennas used today are (commercial) circularly polarized That probably isn't true for VHF/UHF. Take a look at the website of a major supplier of professional antennas such as http://www.amphenol-jaybeam.com/base...nas-search.php. Entering CP in their search engine for base-station antennas yielded 2 results wheras entering VP yielded 365! One of the reasons for greater use of linear polarisations in professional applications is frequency re-use on the orthogonal polarisation some distance away - i.e. the value of the limited VHF/UHF spectrum. That's certainly true in Europe. Ham antennas remain in the linear domain (ala the Yagi and similar) There are many reasons espoused in CP advantages in "point to point" What is the main advantage hams hold over the more popular circular polarized antennas in its "skip" type useage versus "point to point" ? Extensive use is made of 'mixed polarisation' for transmitting VHF FM broadcast services in Europe. It may not be pure circular but it contains significant vertically- and horizontally-polarised components. The mobile and portable receiving antennas have whatever polarisation they end up with, more or less by accident, and fixed rooftop antennas are usually linearly polarised. DAB and terrestrial television are transmitted using V or H linear polarisation. Chris |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Circular polarization... does it have to be synchronous?? | Antenna | |||
Quad and circular polarization | Antenna | |||
Mixing high side versus low side and (f1 - f2) versus (f1 + f2) | Homebrew | |||
Circular vs. Linear and Dipole vs. Loop. Thoughts? | Antenna | |||
Circular V.S. Vertical antenna polarization ! | Broadcasting |