| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#15
August 11th 09, 12:23 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
|
|||
|
|||
Circular versus linear polarization
On Aug 10, 5:21*pm, dave wrote:
Art Unwin wrote: The majority of antennas used today are (commercial) circularly polarized Ham antennas remain in the linear domain (ala the Yagi and similar) There are many reasons espoused in CP advantages in "point to point" What is the main advantage hams hold over the more popular circular polarized antennas in its "skip" type useage versus "point to point" ? Is there a CPOL advantage for atmospherically propagated HF? *I can think of some disadvantages. I am all ears. Go for it |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Circular polarization... does it have to be synchronous?? | Antenna | |||
| Quad and circular polarization | Antenna | |||
| Mixing high side versus low side and (f1 - f2) versus (f1 + f2) | Homebrew | |||
| Circular vs. Linear and Dipole vs. Loop. Thoughts? | Antenna | |||
| Circular V.S. Vertical antenna polarization ! | Broadcasting | |||
Threaded Mode
