Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Art Unwin" wrote in message
... On Aug 10, 11:14 pm, tom wrote: Art Unwin wrote: The majority of antennas used today are (commercial) circularly polarized Ham antennas remain in the linear domain (ala the Yagi and similar) There are many reasons espoused in CP advantages in "point to point" What is the main advantage hams hold over the more popular circular polarized antennas in its "skip" type useage versus "point to point" ? Please provide examples of commercial antennas that are CP. Space communication antennas are not ok to include. Please give counts of CP versus linear in commercial use. tom K0TAR Use your own thread to ask for assistance on your question. Be prepared to answer why you are requesting this personal service . I asked a question on this thread with respect to the main advantage for hams that linear polarization has over CP. I have no resistance to change if it can be justified. I see that it can pick up signals that linear antennas cannot hear because of a 30 db attenuation where as CP has only a 3 db attenuation! So what is it on the other side of the coin is what this thread is posing to those who are familiar with respect to radiators. Cross polarization can be used to provide isolation for duplex links or co-channel sharing. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Circular polarization... does it have to be synchronous?? | Antenna | |||
Quad and circular polarization | Antenna | |||
Mixing high side versus low side and (f1 - f2) versus (f1 + f2) | Homebrew | |||
Circular vs. Linear and Dipole vs. Loop. Thoughts? | Antenna | |||
Circular V.S. Vertical antenna polarization ! | Broadcasting |