LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old August 12th 09, 02:08 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,336
Default Circular versus linear polarization

On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:13:38 -0700, Roy Lewallen
wrote:

A second problem is that the majority of CP antennas, such as the
quadrature fed crossed dipole "turnstile", are circular only directly
broadside, and increasingly elliptical as you move away from that direction.


Sorry, my original reply to this comment was screwed up thanks to me
talking on the phone while writing.

Yeah, the problem with turnstiles CP is at the horizon. At the
horizon, one element of the turnstile would be roughly perpendicular
to me, thus acting as a simple linear dipole. The other crossed
element would be seen from the end, resulting in no radiation in my
direction. So, at the horizon, a turnstile is mostly linear
polarization.

That's why high accuracy GPS antennas use choke rings at the antenna.
It widens the pattern so that it picks up more of the sky, but also
maintains some semblence of CP at the horizon.


I wasn't aware of any GPS receivers using crossed dipole "turnstile"
type antennas. All the ones I've seen use either quadrifilar helix or
patch antennas. Can you point to a reference or two regarding the choke
rings -- I don't know what these are or what they do, and would like to
learn.


If you really want a turnstile GPS antenna:
www.arrl.org/tis/info/pdf/0210036.pdf

As for the choke ring, you've probably seen them in the center of
C-band DBS/TVRO dish antennas.

Links:
http://www.javad.com/jns/index.html?/jns/technology/Choke%20Ring%20Theory.html
http://www.trimble.com/infrastructure/gnss-choke-ring-antenna.aspx?dtID=overview
http://www.gpsworld.com/survey/news/trimble-choke-ring-antenna-uses-dorne-and-margolin-dipole-3620

More detail:
www.novatel.com/Documents/Papers/3D_choke_ring.pdf
If you remove the radome in the center, it's a "pinwheel" antenna,
with which I'm totally unfamiliar. Note the comments on "low
elevation tracking", which is what I was mumbling about for improving
the performance at the horizon. The above article don't show it, but
the choke ring does maintain some semblance of CP near the horizon.

Patent on the dual frequency (L1 and L2 for GPS) choke ring:
http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=EiwIAAAAEBAJ&dq=6278407



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Circular polarization... does it have to be synchronous?? Peter O. Brackett Antenna 79 December 16th 08 01:18 AM
Quad and circular polarization -.-. --.-[_2_] Antenna 26 December 2nd 08 11:18 AM
Mixing high side versus low side and (f1 - f2) versus (f1 + f2) [email protected] Homebrew 6 July 18th 07 02:44 AM
Circular vs. Linear and Dipole vs. Loop. Thoughts? [email protected] Antenna 4 June 18th 06 06:07 AM
Circular V.S. Vertical antenna polarization ! Lex-Lutor Broadcasting 6 March 22nd 05 06:50 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017