| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi Jerry
Very good question ,and I do not have any information regarding their comparison. On this tower due to the size and isolation I would have to split the feeder and have a minumum of two or more antennas around the tower . (Toer is 10m in diameter with steel reinforcing - high front to back isolation) For this specific case , a Lindenbald would perhaps have too much horizontal space to mount a number of them around the tower. Unless you are assuming that one uses one antenna split over the 4 , equally spaced around the tower. Again this is a good question as under normal circumstances one does not have the high isolation between the elements . I could use a 1:4 wilkoson and mount folded dipoles at skewed angles , so at any one time a distant station should see at least two of the 4 . This is a lot to ponder about . |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Circular polarization... does it have to be synchronous?? | Antenna | |||
| Quad and circular polarization | Antenna | |||
| Mixing high side versus low side and (f1 - f2) versus (f1 + f2) | Homebrew | |||
| Circular vs. Linear and Dipole vs. Loop. Thoughts? | Antenna | |||
| Circular V.S. Vertical antenna polarization ! | Broadcasting | |||