Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Jeff Liebermann wrote: I forgot to connect my comments to the original question. Sorry(tm). You're correct. There's no way to get a good isotropic radiator pattern with a simple vertical radiator. However, you can still get fairly close if you make the antenna sufficiently small relative to the operating wavelength. As the physical antenna size approaches a point radiator, the pattern starts to look rather spherical. The difference in pattern between a half-wavelength dipole, and an infinitesimally-short dipole (i.e. one whose length approaches a point source) is actually quite small. Both are torus-shaped patterns, with a deep null along the axis of the antenna (theoretically, the null is infinitely deep directly along the axis). An infinitesimally-short dipole has a maximum gain of 1.76 dBi. A half-wavelength dipole has a gain of 2.15 dBi. There really isn't much to distinguish the two, as far as the pattern and gain go. Unfortunately, the gain drops, efficiency drops, and feed point impedance drops, resulting in a rather inferior antenna. Yeah, the low radiation resistance and high reactance of the short dipole are its biggest drawbacks. -- Dave Platt AE6EO Friends of Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads! |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Force 12 - C3S | Antenna | |||
Air Force 1 | Shortwave | |||
Air Force One | Shortwave | |||
FS: Force 12 | Swap | |||
Force 12 C-4 | Antenna |