Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 4, 8:36*am, "Dave" wrote:
wrote in message ... On Sep 3, 10:33 am, Art Unwin wrote: And I imagine that there are still many readers world wide who are still wondering what constitutes "equilibrium" in an antenna system. * ![]() not any more, he defined it just the other day, equilibrium==isotropic. No David, I just went along with your interpretation of same in the U.S. For my self I will stick to equilibrium as stated in any dictionary. So I accept your terms as one to use in the US electrical arena because you get upset as it may sometimes be equivalent to equilibrium. But I am not going to fight that battle. Personally, I am beginning to think hams mix the terms resonant and equilibrium or is it just the U.S. One day some body is going to say gottcha that is inevitable with so many hits but that is not one of them. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Art Unwin" wrote in message ... On Sep 4, 8:36 am, "Dave" wrote: wrote in message ... On Sep 3, 10:33 am, Art Unwin wrote: And I imagine that there are still many readers world wide who are still wondering what constitutes "equilibrium" in an antenna system. ![]() not any more, he defined it just the other day, equilibrium==isotropic. No David, I just went along with your interpretation of same in the U.S. For my self I will stick to equilibrium as stated in any dictionary. So I accept your terms as one to use in the US electrical arena because you get upset as it may sometimes be equivalent to equilibrium. But I am not going to fight that battle. Personally, I am beginning to think hams mix the terms resonant and equilibrium or is it just the U.S. One day some body is going to say gottcha that is inevitable with so many hits but that is not one of them. there is no reference for 'equilibrium' to be applied to electromagnetic radiation. is just doesn't exist. so you have now given up all your credibility by not sticking with what you admitted was an equivalent of your term 'equilibium' in 'isotropic'. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 4 Sep 2009 14:15:14 -0700 (PDT), Art Unwin
wrote: For my self I will stick to equilibrium as stated in any dictionary. http://www.thefreedictionary.com/equilibrium "A stable situation in which forces cancel one another." That suggests an equation, where the canceling forces are on opposite sides of the equal sign. I'll supply the equal sign. You supply the rest as in: force_1 = force_2 What are the two forces that are being balanced or canceled? -- # Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060 # 831-336-2558 # http://802.11junk.com # http://www.LearnByDestroying.com AE6KS |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Force 12 - C3S | Antenna | |||
Air Force 1 | Shortwave | |||
Air Force One | Shortwave | |||
FS: Force 12 | Swap | |||
Force 12 C-4 | Antenna |