Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old September 4th 09, 10:15 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,339
Default Corriolis force

On Sep 4, 8:36*am, "Dave" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Sep 3, 10:33 am, Art Unwin wrote:

And I imagine that there are still many readers world wide
who are still wondering what constitutes "equilibrium" in
an antenna system. *


not any more, he defined it just the other day, equilibrium==isotropic.


No David, I just went along with your interpretation of same in the
U.S.
For my self I will stick to equilibrium as stated in any dictionary.
So I accept your terms as one to use in the US electrical arena
because you get upset as it may sometimes be equivalent to
equilibrium. But I am not going to fight that battle.
Personally, I am beginning to think hams mix the terms resonant and
equilibrium or is it just the U.S. One day some body is going to say
gottcha that is inevitable with so many hits
but that is not one of them.
  #2   Report Post  
Old September 4th 09, 11:03 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 797
Default Corriolis force


"Art Unwin" wrote in message
...
On Sep 4, 8:36 am, "Dave" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Sep 3, 10:33 am, Art Unwin wrote:

And I imagine that there are still many readers world wide
who are still wondering what constitutes "equilibrium" in
an antenna system.


not any more, he defined it just the other day, equilibrium==isotropic.


No David, I just went along with your interpretation of same in the
U.S.
For my self I will stick to equilibrium as stated in any dictionary.
So I accept your terms as one to use in the US electrical arena
because you get upset as it may sometimes be equivalent to
equilibrium. But I am not going to fight that battle.
Personally, I am beginning to think hams mix the terms resonant and
equilibrium or is it just the U.S. One day some body is going to say
gottcha that is inevitable with so many hits
but that is not one of them.


there is no reference for 'equilibrium' to be applied to electromagnetic
radiation. is just doesn't exist. so you have now given up all your
credibility by not sticking with what you admitted was an equivalent of your
term 'equilibium' in 'isotropic'.

  #3   Report Post  
Old September 5th 09, 05:24 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,336
Default Corriolis force

On Fri, 4 Sep 2009 14:15:14 -0700 (PDT), Art Unwin
wrote:

For my self I will stick to equilibrium as stated in any dictionary.


http://www.thefreedictionary.com/equilibrium
"A stable situation in which forces cancel one another."

That suggests an equation, where the canceling forces are on opposite
sides of the equal sign.

I'll supply the equal sign. You supply the rest as in:
force_1 = force_2
What are the two forces that are being balanced or canceled?



--
# Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060
# 831-336-2558
# http://802.11junk.com
#
http://www.LearnByDestroying.com AE6KS
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Force 12 - C3S [email protected] Antenna 1 October 8th 07 06:56 AM
Air Force 1 dxAce Shortwave 3 May 21st 05 08:08 PM
Air Force One dxAce Shortwave 0 June 29th 04 05:40 PM
FS: Force 12 jerryz Swap 0 October 12th 03 12:47 PM
Force 12 C-4 jerryz Antenna 0 August 9th 03 02:24 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:19 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017