Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Art Unwin wrote:
On Sep 4, 3:03 pm, Mike Coslo wrote: Art Unwin wrote: On Sep 4, 12:48 pm, Michael Coslo wrote: Art Unwin wrote: Mike you forget. I do not subscribe to the wave theory over the particle aproach. I cannot see any other way to fit that "radiation is from the acceleration of a charge". And I can not find any explanation of this in any books. Only mass is able to have spin and at the same time transport energy, at least to my mind. So are you saying that FR energy has mass, or that it doesn't have spin? Therefore accelaration is the creation of two forces that are not in the same plain ala a shear action where the combination of gravity and the Coriolis force are the weakest forces known in the std model. What is the acceleration of RF? - 73 de Mike N3LI - The speed of light. Acceleration isn't expressed as C. Does RF energy have mass? Yes if you see it as a particle and not a electromagnetic wave. A test can be performed easily. If RF energy has mass It then follows that a transmitting antenna will lose mass. Likewise, a receiving antenna will gain mass. The confirming experiment can be made by using a two small antennas in an isolated environment. One is transmitting, and one receiving. If RF energy is a particle - therefore mechanical force, the receiving antenna must accumulate mass, and the transmitting antenna must lose it. We do have the needed resolution of measurement to make that test. - 73 de Mike N3LI - |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Force 12 - C3S | Antenna | |||
Air Force 1 | Shortwave | |||
Air Force One | Shortwave | |||
FS: Force 12 | Swap | |||
Force 12 C-4 | Antenna |