Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Szczepan Bialek" wrote in message ... "Dave" wrote ... "Szczepan Bialek" wrote in message ... "Dave Platt" wrote ... In article , Jeff Liebermann wrote: I forgot to connect my comments to the original question. Sorry(tm). You're correct. There's no way to get a good isotropic radiator pattern with a simple vertical radiator. However, you can still get fairly close if you make the antenna sufficiently small relative to the operating wavelength. As the physical antenna size approaches a point radiator, the pattern starts to look rather spherical. The difference in pattern between a half-wavelength dipole, and an infinitesimally-short dipole (i.e. one whose length approaches a point source) is actually quite small. A dipole is always the two monopoles and never a point source. Only monopole is a point source. S* there is no such thing as a monopole antenna. unless you have discovered the magnetic monopole somewhere? Chris wrote: "Monopole antennas are developed from dipoles by substituting one of the elements, often using a 'reflection' of the remaining element in a ground plane. Their characteristics are different from those of the parent dipole because of this substitution but they still have the same kind of axially-symmetric radiation pattern, with linear polarisation and no radiation in the direction of the end of the monopole." Is he right? different context... "Monopole" antennas as he is describing are a specific type of antennas that are otherwise described as 'verticals', 'ground plane', or several other terms.. all of which actually are dipoles in the context that they have 2 poles, not that they look like a 'half wave dipole' which is a special case of a dipole. In his context it refers to a vertical with some real size greater than zero. in your context the 'monopole is a point source' means you think that a point source is a monopole which is impossible since a monopole(meaning single pole) can't radiate. His description is a bit simplified, but otherwise reasonable for a "Monopole" antenna, but you must always remember there are 2 poles even in a "Monopole" antenna... just one of them is the ground screen or radials. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Force 12 - C3S | Antenna | |||
Air Force 1 | Shortwave | |||
Air Force One | Shortwave | |||
FS: Force 12 | Swap | |||
Force 12 C-4 | Antenna |