Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old September 23rd 09, 12:42 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,521
Default Standing waves

tom wrote:
Note that none of these are particularly close to resonance at the
design frequency.


Yagis do have a resonant frequency but that frequency
is not at the design frequency. At the resonant frequency,
the forward gain and F/B ratio are not optimum. At the
optimum forward gain frequency and/or F/B ratio frequency,
the Yagi, sans matching network, is not resonant.
--
73, Cecil, IEEE, OOTC, http://www.w5dxp.com
  #2   Report Post  
Old September 23rd 09, 01:16 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
tom tom is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: May 2009
Posts: 660
Default Standing waves

Cecil Moore wrote:
tom wrote:
Note that none of these are particularly close to resonance at the
design frequency.


Yagis do have a resonant frequency but that frequency
is not at the design frequency. At the resonant frequency,
the forward gain and F/B ratio are not optimum. At the
optimum forward gain frequency and/or F/B ratio frequency,
the Yagi, sans matching network, is not resonant.


Agreed, although it has become popular to make designs with about 50+j0
driven elements lately. I think it's to make them simpler and lighter
because, as you say, the other characteristics are not optimum if you do.

tom
K0TAR
  #3   Report Post  
Old September 23rd 09, 04:20 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,951
Default Standing waves

On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 07:16:49 -0500, tom wrote:

Cecil Moore wrote:
tom wrote:
Note that none of these are particularly close to resonance at the
design frequency.


Yagis do have a resonant frequency but that frequency
is not at the design frequency. At the resonant frequency,
the forward gain and F/B ratio are not optimum. At the
optimum forward gain frequency and/or F/B ratio frequency,
the Yagi, sans matching network, is not resonant.


That's about as useful as saying you do not obtain the maximum miles
per gallon in your car when the ashtray is half full or when the
carpets are at their optimal brushed out nap.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
  #4   Report Post  
Old September 23rd 09, 07:06 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,521
Default Standing waves

Richard Clark wrote:
That's about as useful as saying you do not obtain the maximum miles
per gallon in your car when the ashtray is half full or when the
carpets are at their optimal brushed out nap.


Nope, it's as useful as saying one cannot get the
advertised miles per gallon when one is driving
the car uphill at 80 mph. Miles per gallon is
related to incline and speed. Frequency, gain,
and F/B ratio are related. I surprised you don't
know that.
--
73, Cecil, IEEE, OOTC, http://www.w5dxp.com
  #5   Report Post  
Old September 24th 09, 12:57 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
tom tom is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: May 2009
Posts: 660
Default Standing waves

Richard Clark wrote:
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 07:16:49 -0500, tom wrote:

Cecil Moore wrote:
tom wrote:
Note that none of these are particularly close to resonance at the
design frequency.
Yagis do have a resonant frequency but that frequency
is not at the design frequency. At the resonant frequency,
the forward gain and F/B ratio are not optimum. At the
optimum forward gain frequency and/or F/B ratio frequency,
the Yagi, sans matching network, is not resonant.


That's about as useful as saying you do not obtain the maximum miles
per gallon in your car when the ashtray is half full or when the
carpets are at their optimal brushed out nap.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC


Nice attribution to me Richard, but Cecil wrote it.

And it makes a lot more sense than your statement, although he could
have worded it better.

tom
K0TAR


  #6   Report Post  
Old September 24th 09, 01:10 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,521
Default Standing waves

tom wrote:
And it makes a lot more sense than your statement, although he could
have worded it better.


Sorry, sometimes I write in Texan rather than English.:-)
--
73, Cecil, IEEE, OOTC, http://www.w5dxp.com
  #7   Report Post  
Old September 24th 09, 01:41 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
tom tom is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: May 2009
Posts: 660
Default Standing waves

Cecil Moore wrote:
tom wrote:
And it makes a lot more sense than your statement, although he could
have worded it better.


Sorry, sometimes I write in Texan rather than English.:-)


Apology accepted. And I know you can't help it.

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Poynting Vector in Standing Waves Gene Fuller Antenna 13 January 23rd 08 12:23 AM
Standing morphing to travelling waves, and other stupid notions Richard Harrison Antenna 3 January 11th 08 06:05 PM
Standing Waves (and Impedance) W. Watson Antenna 83 December 30th 05 03:48 AM
Traveling Waves, Power Waves,..., Any Waves,... pez Antenna 10 December 13th 03 02:43 PM
Imaginary Standing Waves? Richard Fry Antenna 6 November 22nd 03 09:39 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:39 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017