Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The graph shows gain (in the two orthogonal directions) as a function of
spacing. For spacing = 0.14 wavelength, the graph shows a bi-directional gain of about 4 dB (and then a front-to-back ratio of 0 dB). Unless I did something wrong, on EZ-NEC the same array with 0.14 WL spacing shows a free-space zero-elevation gain of about 6.4 dB in one of the two directions, with a front-to-back ratio of about 10.5 dB. Re-thinking on the results, the gain difference is probably due to the fact that the ARRL Antenna Book graph gives dBd, whilst EZ-NEC gives dBi. But what about the great difference in front-to-back? Tony I0JX |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA: ONE DAY - THE ARRL ANTENNA BOOK - 18th Edition - Ham Radio Antenna Book | Antenna | |||
FA: THE ARRL ANTENNA BOOK - 18th Edition - Ham Radio Antenna Book | Antenna | |||
FA: THE ARRL ANTENNA BOOK - 18th Edition - Ham Radio Antenna Book | Equipment | |||
FA: K.W. E-Zee Match Antenna Tuning Unit | Equipment | |||
Gamma match: Inherently inferior to balanced match systems? | Antenna |