Michael Coslo wrote:
Richard Clark wrote:

The corriolus force (twisting) might work too.


Well, done, sir, well done!

Not that well, he could have spelled it correctly,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coriolis_effect

On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:19:35 -0400, "
wrote:

Michael Coslo wrote:
Richard Clark wrote:

The corriolus force (twisting) might work too.


Well, done, sir, well done!

Not that well, he could have spelled it correctly,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coriolis_effect

It was spelled according to the British-American system of Illinoise.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

"Richard Clark" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:19:35 -0400, "
wrote:

Michael Coslo wrote:
Richard Clark wrote:

The corriolus force (twisting) might work too.


Well, done, sir, well done!

Not that well, he could have spelled it correctly,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coriolis_effect

It was spelled according to the British-American system of Illinoise.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC


* 'Two countries separated by the same language'.

Chris

wrote:
Michael Coslo wrote:
Richard Clark wrote:

The corriolus force (twisting) might work too.


Well, done, sir, well done!

Not that well, he could have spelled it correctly,


In the time honored tradition of destroying a joke by explaining it,
Richard made a remark about the OP's noting that other threads get a lot
more traction, namely the Coriolis thread of Arts'. That one had a lot
of posts. The twisting was the obvious reference to Arts' theory, which
was combined and brought home with the necessary twist on the antenna
elements. Finally, the spelling - well, Art has been known to make a few
spelling mistakes. We're talking three levels of joke in one here!


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coriolis_effect