LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #16   Report Post  
Old September 24th 09, 11:37 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,951
Default cordless phone range

On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:57:19 -0700 (PDT), KD7HB
wrote:

Hi, Richard.
I learned of this trick many years ago, 1960's time frame. Portland
drilled a second tunnel through a ridge on West Burnside street,
making it two lanes each direction. Drivers began complaining that
their radio reception always went out when they entered the tunnel.
Duh!!! Everyone said nothing could be done, This was the way radio
worked.

One engineer said he could fix it. They mounted insulators in the
tunnel ceiling, and strung a wire the full length of the tunnel. On
the East side, they ran the wire up somewhere on the hillside. I never
was able to determine just where it went. The antenna picked up the
local am/fm signals and radiated them in the tunnel. Drivers could
continue to listen to the radio when they went into the tunnel. Volume
was reduced sometimes, but reception continued.

I wonder if hf and vhf ham radio operation is possible in the tunnel?

I see the same wire trick in other tunnels. The I-90 tunnels East of
Seattle have the wire.

Paul, KD7HB


Hi Paul,

You can get the same thing going through the tunnel north of the
Golden Gate bridge (this from my experience of 50 years ago).

What these couplings are, for AM at least, are evanescent waves, what
current science calls Plasmons. Others here cut and paste reports of
Tunneling (of the relativistic kind, not the hole in a mountain kind)
- all the same thing, none of which is understood by those who simply
push the copy button on a Xerox.

As the frequency rises, however, it is harder to propagate that energy
90 degrees off the wire unless you are within one quarter to one third
of a wavelength away (which now brings rise to parasitic coupling - as
I said all of this is the same stuff).

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cordless phone on 905 mhz Steve Shortwave 11 March 19th 07 10:19 PM
cordless phone [email protected] Scanner 39 February 25th 05 02:24 AM
Cordless Phone Freqs. Radio Man Scanner 3 September 16th 04 01:10 AM
Is this cordless phone legal in US? Jim Scanner 3 June 16th 04 06:08 AM
cordless phone 48 to 48.350 in .025 steps Dan Jacobson Scanner 3 November 10th 03 09:54 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:29 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017