Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:57:19 -0700 (PDT), KD7HB
wrote: Hi, Richard. I learned of this trick many years ago, 1960's time frame. Portland drilled a second tunnel through a ridge on West Burnside street, making it two lanes each direction. Drivers began complaining that their radio reception always went out when they entered the tunnel. Duh!!! Everyone said nothing could be done, This was the way radio worked. One engineer said he could fix it. They mounted insulators in the tunnel ceiling, and strung a wire the full length of the tunnel. On the East side, they ran the wire up somewhere on the hillside. I never was able to determine just where it went. The antenna picked up the local am/fm signals and radiated them in the tunnel. Drivers could continue to listen to the radio when they went into the tunnel. Volume was reduced sometimes, but reception continued. I wonder if hf and vhf ham radio operation is possible in the tunnel? I see the same wire trick in other tunnels. The I-90 tunnels East of Seattle have the wire. Paul, KD7HB Hi Paul, You can get the same thing going through the tunnel north of the Golden Gate bridge (this from my experience of 50 years ago). What these couplings are, for AM at least, are evanescent waves, what current science calls Plasmons. Others here cut and paste reports of Tunneling (of the relativistic kind, not the hole in a mountain kind) - all the same thing, none of which is understood by those who simply push the copy button on a Xerox. As the frequency rises, however, it is harder to propagate that energy 90 degrees off the wire unless you are within one quarter to one third of a wavelength away (which now brings rise to parasitic coupling - as I said all of this is the same stuff). 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Cordless phone on 905 mhz | Shortwave | |||
cordless phone | Scanner | |||
Cordless Phone Freqs. | Scanner | |||
Is this cordless phone legal in US? | Scanner | |||
cordless phone 48 to 48.350 in .025 steps | Scanner |