Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tdonaly wrote:
Cecil should read before he thinks. Tom, why do you require 6 decimal point precision out of a ballpark rule-of-thumb estimate? The maximum reactance point of a thin-wire dipole is in the neighborhood of the maximum reactance point of the SWR circle as proved by the graphs in the ARRL Antenna Book CD. The maximum reactance is approximately equal to 1/2 the maximum resistance. The resistance at the maximum reactance point is approximately equal to 1/2 the maximum resistance. If someone carries those ballpark concepts around in his head, he will be reasonably close to reality. It's all cut-and-try after that. Exactly what agenda forces you to sacrifice your reputation trying to find some unusual esoteric exception to my statements? (Never mind, I already know the answer.) -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
EH Antenna Revisited | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |