Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's interesting to model this sort of arrangement, note the wide
range of feedpoint impedances that will be seen on the different bands, and observe the feedline losses that might be incurred when it is directly fed with 50 ohm coax. If you then introduce an ideal transformer at the feedpoint and repeat the exercise you will generally find that feedline losses increase on some bands and decrease on others. With the vertical length I tried, the effect of a 1:9 transformer was to limit the more extreme losses at the cost of making some very low losses higher. I guess over the several bands I tried you could say there was a net improvement with the transformer. But one question would be how to build this ideal 1:9 transformer which maintains its transformation ratio and exhibits zero loss across the wide range of impedances and frequencies involved. Steve G3TXQ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Tube and Twin lead Slim Jim | Antenna | |||
100 Ohm Twin Lead | Antenna | |||
Twin lead lightning arrestor? | Antenna | |||
300 Ohm Twin Lead Antenna Wire | Antenna | |||
Staples and twin lead | Antenna |