On Oct 11, 7:49*am, tom wrote:
jaroslav lipka wrote:
Tom
* * * And you call yourself intelligent, the fact you even asked the
question shows what a dipstick you are.
* * * *Read and absorb.

Jaro

Oh, and let's make it a nice simple antenna for say 40m.

tom
K0TAR

Tom

There you go again asking others to do your work,
do you ever do things for yourself.
You asked for the information, you got it, use it or shut it.

Jaro

jaroslav lipka wrote:
On Oct 11, 7:49 am, tom wrote:
jaroslav lipka wrote:
Tom
And you call yourself intelligent, the fact you even asked the
question shows what a dipstick you are.
Read and absorb.
Jaro
Oh, and let's make it a nice simple antenna for say 40m.

tom
K0TAR

Tom

There you go again asking others to do your work,
do you ever do things for yourself.
You asked for the information, you got it, use it or shut it.

Jaro

Exactly the answer I expected.

So you don't understand him either, and are just posing.

GOAT! (Means "GO Away Troll" since you assuredly don't know that)

tom
K0TAR

On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 19:54:20 -0500, tom wrote:

GOAT! (Means "GO Away Troll" since you assuredly don't know that)

Please, Tom, this is like rejecting the discovery of stumbling across
a piano bench frozen into a glacier. Art would expect us to next find
the piano, look at the music stand and discover the concert that had
been composed.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Richard Clark wrote:

Please, Tom, this is like rejecting the discovery of stumbling across
a piano bench frozen into a glacier. Art would expect us to next find
the piano, look at the music stand and discover the concert that had
been composed.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Of course. You are correct. How foolish of me.

tom
K0TAR

On Oct 10, 9:42*pm, tom wrote:
Richard Clark wrote:

Please, Tom, this is like rejecting the discovery of stumbling across
a piano bench frozen into a glacier. *Art would expect us to next find
the piano, look at the music stand and discover the concert that had
been composed.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Of course. *You are correct. *How foolish of me.

tom
K0TAR

I think Art has learned to do sock puppets.

Jimmie

On Oct 10, 10:03*pm, JIMMIE wrote:
On Oct 10, 9:42*pm, tom wrote:

Richard Clark wrote:

Please, Tom, this is like rejecting the discovery of stumbling across
a piano bench frozen into a glacier. *Art would expect us to next find
the piano, look at the music stand and discover the concert that had
been composed.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Of course. *You are correct. *How foolish of me.

tom
K0TAR

*I think Art has learned to do sock puppets.

Jimmie

Hummm.. Maybe so. I was starting to think he had a new trunk monkey
to do the dirty work dealing with the vast legion of non believers..
IE: non believer asks for more details.. Trunk monkey throws bananas
at him, and then runs up and starts humping his leg..

On Oct 10, 8:03*pm, JIMMIE wrote:
On Oct 10, 9:42*pm, tom wrote:

Richard Clark wrote:

Please, Tom, this is like rejecting the discovery of stumbling across
a piano bench frozen into a glacier. *Art would expect us to next find
the piano, look at the music stand and discover the concert that had
been composed.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Of course. *You are correct. *How foolish of me.

tom
K0TAR

*I think Art has learned to do sock puppets.

Jimmie


Agreed.

"Art Unwin" is playing some of you guys like a cheap fiddle. For all
we know, Art is a pimply-faced 14-year old, armed only with a
thesaurus and delusions of adequacy. He might qualify as Exhibit A in
a college course in Abnormal Psychology.

I stopped taking any of his posts seriously several months ago.
Coming soon, the next step: ignoring any threads in which his name
appears.

Sal

"Richard Clark" schreef in bericht
...
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 19:54:20 -0500, tom
wrote:

Please, Tom, this is like rejecting the discovery of stumbling
across
a piano bench frozen into a glacier. Art would expect us to
next find
the piano, look at the music stand and discover the concert
that had
been composed.
Hence, Art is an evolutionist? ;-)

73 - Gerard Oppewal - PE1OUD

On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 14:03:02 +0200, "Gerard" wrote:

Hence, Art is an evolutionist? ;-)

Evolved? Never.
Revolved (Corriolis)? Perhaps.
Devolved? Almost certainly.
According to Art, himself, he would a levitationist.

What would account for his astonishing description?
"Thus we have three types of Leptons
each able to produce one of the primary colours,
red, green or yellow."

I wonder what happened to Blue (or ultra blue for that matter, or even
X-ray). It might astonish Art (belay my last, that isn't going to
happen) that red and green combined ARE yellow (how does that not
happen in Art's side of reality?). Even Newton understood this. Of
course, this may be Art's spit-on-Newton week.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC