Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael Coslo wrote in
: Woe is the day someone gets a patent on "random". Nope. Celebrate it. If it happens the patent system will lose credibility as a protection, let alone value for money, and people will rely on copyright law instead. Maybe that needs reform but the patent system is irredeemable in my view. The sooner it is terminally discredited the better. That was off-topic, I know, but I withstood a few temptations already, and I won't get carried away. I don't expect everyone to agree so I won't argue it. if someome makes something work, and can get paid for the actual work, good for them, I don't think anyone should stand in the way of that. If people want to protect ideas, write them down, date them, and copyright them. That way plagiarism is preventable but suppression of anything remotely resembling it is not a legal option. And people won't be able to make claims for garbage while citing patents that shouldn't have been granted anyway, and wouldn't, if those granted could understand what was behind the obfuscating nonsense that some try to pass as a real invention. /rant. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Fractal 10m Antenna | Antenna | |||
Interesting antenna. Semi-fractal?? | Antenna | |||
Fractal Transmitter Antenna | Shortwave | |||
Penn State fractal antenna reduces unwanted lobes | Antenna | |||
FRACTAL ANTENNA | Antenna |