Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 6, 12:04*am, wrote:
Art Unwin wrote: Now physics forums have moderators with the power to ban questions that challenge existing laws (waves) where as the questions and the poster can be censored and banned. Umm, no. The moderated groups just don't want to be bothered by drooling crackpots and raving mental patients. If someone attempts to post something that has data and math to back up a new idea, it will get posted. If someone attempts to post a bunch of rambling nonsense, it won't. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: --- It depends on what they consider "nonsense". In my case they quoted QED as being final, so I then tried to see what definition they had on "waves" to see what the property they saw symbolized waves such as helical waves, but they declined to discuss. Looking thru the web I find that this is normal practice, tho they "may" know the answer they prefer to take the tack as some do on this group "because I said so". I can understand it from this group but from those who practice physics I do not. Maybe this rejection of outsiders is why things are in such a mess where they now even call other physicists "crackpots" when they stray from the accepted line. Like this group, they demand all, such as experimental results and mathematics but decline to do the same in rebuttal believing they are above it. I imagine that this must be the very case in present day colleges in the US and else ware! I suppose we can call it just being human and turf protection. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
sci.physics.electromag NEEDS YOU! | Antenna | |||
Stevie the censor | Policy | |||
the 'language' of physics GOSPELS FAR FROM THE TRUTH --Mor... | Shortwave | |||
Physics according to toad | Policy | |||
Ye canna change the lars o' physics | CB |