[Art Unwin]

On Jan 6, 11:22*am, Lostgallifreyan wrote:
Art Unwin wrote in news:9e8de79b-123c-47fc-9187-
:

Provide a reasonable rebuttal and you have
my attention, otherwise, concentrate on keeping the beakers clean as
well as the benches.

Ok, you just lost my sympathy with that cheap shot, I don't care that it's
not aimed at me. You obviously didn't care about it before when I said I
sympathised. You're an idiot, and I'm putting you on the killfile so I don't
have to see what you say again. If you really want to win any kind of respect
you're on a hiding to nothing the way you're going. You sound like you want
to be as arrogant as those you affect to despise appear to you to be. At
which point it stops being about science at all.

Suit yourself. It was he who used the words "nonsense, ramblings"
etc so I threw them back and will always do that. Now you bestow the
word "idiot" what should I say in return? For years he has slandered
me, just look at his record in the archives. Like many others who are
now getting old they seem to magnify their accomplishments and the
promotions they should have got for their endevours in life that some,
on the West Coast that is, suggest that they can see Russia from their
homes just to impress. So now you have become a judge with outstanding
qualities, O my! Don't often see people like you in East London as far
as I can remember, at least not for long.
As for science, all on this group say it is illegal to add a time
varying field to a static field to make it dynamic ,which equates to
Maxwells equations. If you don't agree with them then they have the
license to slam you. Good grief That is their standard on science that
they align with.