Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 6, 7:49*pm, wrote:
Art Unwin wrote: On Jan 6, 12:22*pm, wrote: Art Unwin wrote: On Jan 6, 10:30*am, wrote: Art Unwin wrote: On Jan 6, 12:04*am, wrote: Art Unwin wrote: Now physics forums have moderators with the power to ban questions that challenge existing laws (waves) where as the questions and the poster can be censored and banned. Umm, no. The moderated groups just don't want to be bothered by drooling crackpots and raving mental patients. If someone attempts to post something that has data and math to back up a new idea, it will get posted. If someone attempts to post a bunch of rambling nonsense, it won't. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: --- It depends on what they consider "nonsense". In my case they quoted QED as being final, so I then tried to see what definition they had on "waves" to see what the property they saw symbolized waves such as helical waves, but they declined to discuss. Or in other words you attempted to post a bunch of ramblings about "helical waves" without any results or math and expected them to spoon feed you the contents of generally available texts such as "QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter" by Richard Feynman. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: --- How can you apply mathematics to an observation that matches observations and conclusions to Faraday, Gauss, Maxwell and others? With Maxwell's equations, which are a set of four partial differential equations that relate the electric and magnetic fields to their sources, charge density and current density. With Gauss's flux theorem, which is a law relating the distribution of electric charge to the resulting electric field. With Faraday's law of induction which relates the induced electromotive force in a closed circuit to the time rate of change of the magnetic flux through the circuit. Reading the above means nothing, you have to understand it Yep, which you obviously don't. However, you can't with arm waving rambling. snip rambling As a lab technition I don't expect you to know the answers I have never in my life been a lab technition (sic). Keep trying you should be able to master it snip rambling You, yourself, have a long experience as a technician You have no clue what experience I have. O yes I do, I read your postings in the archives to understand what level you are. Oh, no you don't and you have no clue what I have done, what I do, or what credentials I might have as I don't post such information. snip ravings about "equilibrium" I have yet to see a single equation from you that supports ANY of your ranting nonsense. and you never will. just generic hand waving and wild rants with no basis in reality. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
sci.physics.electromag NEEDS YOU! | Antenna | |||
Stevie the censor | Policy | |||
the 'language' of physics GOSPELS FAR FROM THE TRUTH --Mor... | Shortwave | |||
Physics according to toad | Policy | |||
Ye canna change the lars o' physics | CB |