LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10   Report Post  
Old January 6th 10, 11:25 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Oct 2009
Posts: 85
Default Physics forums censor ship

On Jan 6, 7:49*pm, wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
On Jan 6, 12:22*pm, wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
On Jan 6, 10:30*am, wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
On Jan 6, 12:04*am, wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
Now physics forums have moderators with the power to ban questions
that challenge existing laws (waves) where as the questions and the
poster can be censored and banned.


Umm, no.


The moderated groups just don't want to be bothered by drooling crackpots
and raving mental patients.


If someone attempts to post something that has data and math to back up
a new idea, it will get posted.


If someone attempts to post a bunch of rambling nonsense, it won't.


--
Jim Pennino


Remove .spam.sux to reply.


--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ---


It depends on what they consider "nonsense". In my case they quoted
QED as being final, so I then tried to see what definition they had on
"waves" to see what the property they saw symbolized waves such as
helical waves, but they declined to discuss.


Or in other words you attempted to post a bunch of ramblings about
"helical waves" without any results or math and expected them to spoon
feed you the contents of generally available texts such as "QED: The
Strange Theory of Light and Matter" by Richard Feynman.


--
Jim Pennino


Remove .spam.sux to reply.


--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ---


How can you apply mathematics to an observation that matches
observations and conclusions to Faraday, Gauss, Maxwell and others?


With Maxwell's equations, which are a set of four partial differential
equations that relate the electric and magnetic fields to their sources,
charge density and current density.


With Gauss's flux theorem, which is a law relating the distribution of
electric charge to the resulting electric field.


With Faraday's law of induction which relates the induced electromotive
force in a closed circuit to the time rate of change of the magnetic flux
through the circuit.


Reading the above means nothing, you have to understand it


Yep, which you obviously don't.



However, you can't with arm waving rambling.


snip rambling


As a lab technition I don't expect you to know the answers


I have never in my life been a lab technition (sic).

Keep trying you should be able to master it


snip rambling


You, yourself, have a long experience as a technician


You have no clue what experience I have.

O yes I do, I read your postings in the archives to understand what
level you are.


Oh, no you don't and you have no clue what I have done, what I do, or
what credentials I might have as I don't post such information.

snip ravings about "equilibrium"

I have yet to see a single equation from you that supports ANY of your
ranting nonsense.


and you never will. just generic hand waving and wild rants with no
basis in reality.


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
sci.physics.electromag NEEDS YOU! Dave Antenna 16 December 14th 07 12:17 PM
Stevie the censor an_old_friend Policy 0 December 3rd 05 06:07 PM
the 'language' of physics GOSPELS FAR FROM THE TRUTH --Mor... [email protected] Shortwave 18 August 7th 05 02:59 AM
Physics according to toad Cmd Buzz Corey Policy 5 May 28th 05 04:57 PM
Ye canna change the lars o' physics Dave VanHorn CB 5 August 2nd 03 08:34 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:10 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017