[Lostgallifreyan]

wrote in :

Richard Clark wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 01:50:47 -0000, wrote:

Art Unwin wrote:

David, the acceptance that equilibrium must prevail for toatal
accountability states that one cannot use a 1/2 wave radiator as a
basis for the application of Maxwells equations.

Babbling nonsense.

Actually there is much sense: there is no acceptance by anyone that
equilibrium "must" prevail (whatever that means) but by the author and
that Arthur stands alone.

Such tests as these pride of authorships statements are, fall into the
same category as oaths of allegience during the commie scare.

"Are you now, or were you ever a member of the Gaussian Party?"

"My attorney advises me that I have the right to remain
equilibrated."

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Nonsense; Maxwell's equations always apply and "equilibrium" is just
babble.



I think that's kind of what he was getting at. At least, it looked like a
reflection on Art's use of 'equilibrium', a use only Art seems to see. If no-
one else is bound by it, it follows that other people can devise half-wave
dipoles in accordance with Maxwell's equations, as I imagine they often do.