Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 12:23:01 -0800 (PST), Tom Horne
wrote: What would be different is that the electrical connection would no longer be occurring at a point of contact between dissimilar metals which would be separated from each other by the non conductive washer of the dielectric union. Hi Tom, I would offer that this non-conductive washer will not solve what you perceive to be a problem IF it has any water (solution) that can bridge it. I still had lightning down conductors connected to the bottom of both pieces of pipe. This specific information guarantees a current path for the galvanic action, IF water wets both sides of the insulated washer and joins them. Instead of washers (this is all pretty vague in the geometry), you should go for insulated stand-offs to increase the separation so as to allow water to wash off rather than to bead up and join the two metals. An oversize (as in very wide) washer might do. Hose down the join and look at the water's wetting of the join. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Clark wrote in
: I still had lightning down conductors connected to the bottom of both pieces of pipe. This specific information guarantees a current path for the galvanic action, IF water wets both sides of the insulated washer and joins them. That's true, but it also suggests that sacrificial action can be worked. If water with ionic contaminants bridges the gap (across the dielectric) to close a local circuit, cause current flow and corrosion, then it's a loop that presumably does not place current in a signal line, or any resulting noise (but considering that a galvanic battery is not generally noisy, that's probably irrelevant). Jimmie mentions interposing brass between copper and galvanised (zinc coated) plumbing, and surely that would be to reduce potential between dissimilar metals and so reduce current and corrosion at each junction, but ultimately one metal will gain metal from the other in the join, (usually as a mess of salts), but so long as the one that loses is the negative electrode in the loop, and is a sacrificeable part, then until it needs replacing, the only other maintenance needed might be a wire-brushing and regreasing. Short of ensuring same-metal interfaces, I can't think of another strategy except to seal out moisture, and ideally gas too. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Cutting non ferrous metals with a table saw | Homebrew | |||
Dissimilar transistors in VHF 55W PA made to work by DC radio pirate | Homebrew | |||
Dissimilar Metal Question | Swap | |||
BUY an auction house -- for precious metals | Shortwave | |||
Antenna mount | Scanner |