Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
A tank circuit represents an antenna closed circuit where in the
absence of friction shows the action of electric field changing to a magnetic field as a sample of perpetual motion. However perpetual motion does not exist so to account for all forces involved we have to determine the amount of friction. We cannot use a series circuit as we have no way of determining friction OR the point of the curve crossing the the zero reactance level. Thus we have to use a parallel circuit where we can use the cross over point as being a period where it is seen as balanced and in equilibrium. The reason we cannot use a series circuit or anything pertaining to a fractional wave in examining the performance of a radiator is because the impedance curve does not represent a true sine wave. After a period of time has occurred the source replaces any frictional losses that have occurred. To do this the amplitude of the curve at the beginning of a cycle moves higher than any othe point on the curve where it replaces and exceeds the frictional losses that have occurred. By doing this it uses time that is not in accordance to a true sine wave and detracts from the accuracy of the following curve. This useage of time during a period or cycle must be accounted for if one is to determine all forces involved, which is why equilibrium or balance must be followed when determining the characteristics of radiation. There fore ,it should be seen that a full wave length or multiples there of should be considered when dealing with radiators since otherwise we are ignoring the overshoot effect required to replace frictional losses. Modern computer programs equiped with an optimiser are equiped to deal with this as they will modify any inputs such that they are in accordance with Maxwells laws where all forces are considered. In the case of a yagi it must be seen that each element radiates including the last one where the value is unknown and not included in a fudged result. If one supplies an input that does not pre guide a planar solution all optimiser programs will account for all forces involved and will always supply an array that is not planar as a yagi shows. Thus for accurracy with respect to Maxwells laws one must have an array that is in equilibrium which reflects Newtons laws where vectors outside the "boundary" such as gravity and the Earths rotatation is reflected by opposing vectors within the boundary. The consequences of this is that the rotation vector in combination of that of gravity will always produce an array that opposes gravity alone as with a vertical at 90 degrees to the Earths surface if one pursuit is accuracy. The requirement of equilibrium is shown by the law of Gauss which when added by a time varying field equates to the laws of Maxwell which demands the presence of equilibrium and shows that a static particle must be present to provide mass to which, via accelleration or decelleration, which serves as the carrier of charge or charge. This in no way conflicts with ideas or theories that particles and waves can provide similar properties under certain cercumstances but instead provides proof that particles are the carriers of what is known as communication. Cheers and beers. Art Unwin KB9MZ...xg |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Measureing Q of a pi tank circuit | Homebrew | |||
FA: B&W 852 Tank Circuit | Swap | |||
FA: B&W 852 Tank Circuit | Boatanchors | |||
FA: B&W 852 tank circuit | Swap | |||
FA: B&W 852 tank circuit | Boatanchors |