Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old March 22nd 10, 12:25 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
joe joe is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Feb 2010
Posts: 55
Default Radiation penetration/absorbtion

Art Unwin wrote:

Ok so you are not interested in a debate. I thought that as a newby
you might just be a little uncomfortable with the idea of using
Quantum theory if you desire particles or to use classical physics if
you desire waves. Obviously it is very difficult to accept change.
Any way thanks for your response and the technical data you supplied
for all to digest.
Regards
Art


Art,
You seem to be the one avoiding a discussion. When the conversation does
not go your way, you call it quits.

I do my part in responding to your points and pose some questions of my own.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Polarized radiation Szczepan Białek Antenna 11 June 9th 09 08:34 AM
Skin Thickness, RF penetration into conductors. [email protected] Shortwave 1 October 13th 07 01:56 AM
UHF penetration & path loss Q: Ken Bessler Antenna 5 April 20th 05 01:57 PM
Electromagnetic radiation Mike Terry Shortwave 0 August 24th 04 10:23 PM
TWTHED'S SPHINCTER POPS FROM STRESS OF GAY PENETRATION Citizens For A Keyclown-Free Newsgroup CB 1 November 11th 03 07:13 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:06 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017