Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 22, 2:25*am, Art Unwin wrote:
As I run through some other physics books I see situations that abound where a static field is made dynamic! It just doesn't make sense that hams who consider themselves as experts with respect to antennas can now suddenly declare that it is now deemed illegal I suppose with respect to free speech one can say anything if they do not care about their credability of being an expert.This is not just a single ham but the majority of the hams commenting on this group. If a poll is taken then hams have proved them selves to be in the right and truly expert. What fraction of the ham population is on r.r.a.a. do you think? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Polarized radiation | Antenna | |||
Skin Thickness, RF penetration into conductors. | Shortwave | |||
UHF penetration & path loss Q: | Antenna | |||
Electromagnetic radiation | Shortwave | |||
TWTHED'S SPHINCTER POPS FROM STRESS OF GAY PENETRATION | CB |