LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #14   Report Post  
Old March 22nd 10, 03:19 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2007
Posts: 91
Default Radiation penetration/absorbtion

On Mar 22, 2:25*am, Art Unwin wrote:

As I run through some other physics books I see situations that abound
where a static field is made dynamic! It just doesn't make sense that
hams who consider themselves as experts with respect to antennas can
now suddenly declare that it is now deemed illegal
I suppose with respect to free speech one can say anything if they do
not care about their credability of being an expert.This is not just a
single ham but the majority of the hams
commenting on this group. If a poll is taken then hams have proved
them selves to be in the right and truly expert.


What fraction of the ham population is on r.r.a.a. do you think?

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Polarized radiation Szczepan Białek Antenna 11 June 9th 09 08:34 AM
Skin Thickness, RF penetration into conductors. [email protected] Shortwave 1 October 13th 07 01:56 AM
UHF penetration & path loss Q: Ken Bessler Antenna 5 April 20th 05 01:57 PM
Electromagnetic radiation Mike Terry Shortwave 0 August 24th 04 10:23 PM
TWTHED'S SPHINCTER POPS FROM STRESS OF GAY PENETRATION Citizens For A Keyclown-Free Newsgroup CB 1 November 11th 03 07:13 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017