Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old March 22nd 10, 03:35 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2007
Posts: 91
Default Radiation penetration/absorbtion

On Mar 21, 8:49*pm, Art Unwin wrote:


http://www.amazon.com/Electromagneti...ion-George-Bek...


What does the book point to, waves or particles?


Look for yourself.

they have placed their own interpretations of the observations seen
with the double slit experiment as over ruling of all and cast in
stone. This is what the physics forum sponsored by Scientific American
said to me as they banned me because of my temerity in challenging
their position


You are such a martyr. My guess is that you were banned from a
moderated forum because you made a nuisance of yourself. But your will
always be able to come to r.r.a.a. and be as absurd as you care to be.
  #2   Report Post  
Old March 22nd 10, 04:18 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,339
Default Radiation penetration/absorbtion

On Mar 21, 10:35*pm, Bill wrote:
On Mar 21, 8:49*pm, Art Unwin wrote:



http://www.amazon.com/Electromagneti...ion-George-Bek....


What does the book point to, waves or particles?


Look for yourself.

they have placed their own interpretations of the observations seen
with the double slit experiment as over ruling of all and cast in
stone. This is what the physics forum sponsored by Scientific American
said to me as they banned me because of my temerity in challenging
their position


You are such a martyr. *My guess is that you were banned from a
moderated forum because you made a nuisance of yourself. But your will
always be able to come to r.r.a.a. and be as absurd as you care to be.


No I was banned for not conforming with known physics which was
considered arguementive. I was given the option of showing an
understanding and aproval of known physics for reinstatement. I
supplied such information to you as a sample of the truth regardless
whether it was in my favour or not knowing full well one might seize
upon it
to my detriment.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Polarized radiation Szczepan Białek Antenna 11 June 9th 09 08:34 AM
Skin Thickness, RF penetration into conductors. [email protected] Shortwave 1 October 13th 07 01:56 AM
UHF penetration & path loss Q: Ken Bessler Antenna 5 April 20th 05 01:57 PM
Electromagnetic radiation Mike Terry Shortwave 0 August 24th 04 10:23 PM
TWTHED'S SPHINCTER POPS FROM STRESS OF GAY PENETRATION Citizens For A Keyclown-Free Newsgroup CB 1 November 11th 03 07:13 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017