Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Fry wrote:
On Mar 22, 8:23 am, Art Unwin wrote: I certainly would not feel comfortable using such openings as protection against lightning. Real comfort is produced by real (proven) knowledge, not intuition. The purposes of the gridded cavity are (1) to isolate its radiating elements from coupling into the nearby supporting tower, (2) to minimize coupling into adjacent cavities on the same level and those installed above and below, (3) to minimize the windload of the installed antenna compared to using solid cavities, and (4) to create predictable, unit radiation patterns that can be used together to generate specific, directional radiation patterns for the array that meet given specifications in the azimuth and elevation planes. The cavity, and all of its components operate nearly at earth ground potential in the low r-f spectrum, where induced energy from nearby lightning strikes is greatest. Arrays of these cavity antennas have been in operation at the top of the Sears Tower in Chicago and many other "tall-tower" sites for more than 25 years now, with zero lightning damage. RF Do you have any web references to gridded cavity antennas? My intuition says your statements are correct. It is likely not wrong. Thanks. tom K0TAR |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Polarized radiation | Antenna | |||
Skin Thickness, RF penetration into conductors. | Shortwave | |||
UHF penetration & path loss Q: | Antenna | |||
Electromagnetic radiation | Shortwave | |||
TWTHED'S SPHINCTER POPS FROM STRESS OF GAY PENETRATION | CB |