LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #21   Report Post  
Old March 24th 10, 02:22 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
tom tom is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: May 2009
Posts: 660
Default Radiation penetration/absorbtion

On 3/23/2010 7:20 PM, Art Unwin wrote:
your whole concept is malformed. if the 'static particles' are in
'equilibrium' (i.e. not moving) and then you add a time varying field


Equilibrium does not mean not moving.

I won't go any deeper since you have problems with things complex and go
into babble mode when confronted with them.

tom
K0TAR



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Polarized radiation Szczepan Białek Antenna 11 June 9th 09 08:34 AM
Skin Thickness, RF penetration into conductors. [email protected] Shortwave 1 October 13th 07 01:56 AM
UHF penetration & path loss Q: Ken Bessler Antenna 5 April 20th 05 01:57 PM
Electromagnetic radiation Mike Terry Shortwave 0 August 24th 04 10:23 PM
TWTHED'S SPHINCTER POPS FROM STRESS OF GAY PENETRATION Citizens For A Keyclown-Free Newsgroup CB 1 November 11th 03 07:13 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:13 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017