Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "joe" wrote ... Art Unwin wrote: On Mar 23, 6:34 pm, Dave wrote: Joe, I wanted a debate as to why adding a time varying field to a boundary enclosed static particles in equilibrium is illegal. As I said before, just adding "+t" to an equation does not make it right. If I've interpreted your position wrong, then it is because you have not clearly expressed it. Art's antennas radiate from the ends. There are charges but they are not static. Gauss flux is for staic charge. If you add "+t" the flux will be the oscillating flux. G3LHZ went to conclusion that antennas are source/sink. The same did Art. Am I right, Art? In such case particles (electrons?) oscillate also. But the waves consist of oscillating "particles". Maxwell's waves consist of rotating oscillations, Art's are longitudinal. The ball, as it has always been, is in your court. It is not a matter of accepting the laws of physics. It is what you do with/to them that may be the problem. If you want to discuss physics, present your case the way those knowledgeable in the field would do. Art write too long posts. S* |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Polarized radiation | Antenna | |||
Skin Thickness, RF penetration into conductors. | Shortwave | |||
UHF penetration & path loss Q: | Antenna | |||
Electromagnetic radiation | Shortwave | |||
TWTHED'S SPHINCTER POPS FROM STRESS OF GAY PENETRATION | CB |