Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 4, 4:19*pm, Bob wrote:
I'm plugging the velocity factor figure into Cecil's program for optimum feedline lengths on a multiband dipole, IMAXMIN.EXE. Given the approximate nature of this kind of feed, a ballpark figure is probably okay. Yes, given all the variables, adjusting the final length, sometimes by a few feet (depending on wavelength) is almost always required to achieve system resonance. Remember that this approach is designed to eliminate the tuner and therefore eliminate tuner losses and it is designed to be used with a 1:1 current-choke-balun. Owen's comments are certainly valid for systems using antenna tuners and 4:1 baluns. In fact, if one chooses a ladder-line length halfway in between my "good" (current maximum) and "bad" (voltage maximum) lengths, one will obtain the odd 1/8 wavelengths points that are recommended for use with 4:1 baluns. Those points result in a ballpark impedance in the neighborhood of Z0 +/- jZ0/4, e.g. 400+j100 ohms. For those who understand a Smith Chart, a picture is worth a thousand words. http://www.w5dxp.com/smith.htm -- 73, Cecil, w5dxp.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Velocity Factor #2 | Antenna | |||
Group Velocity and Velocity Factor | Antenna | |||
Velocity factor | Antenna | |||
velocity factor??? | Antenna | |||
Velocity factor and impedance of ladder line | Antenna |