Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 05:06:42 -0700 (PDT), WA2SI
wrote: Visualize, if you will, two wire Christmas tree shaped wire loops, 90 degrees from one another, fed at the center of their bottom legs up abt 30'. Hi Bert, This is the design of Bellini and Tosi of 105 years ago. They fed it through a goniometer so they could steer the beam angle. At the time they were unconcerned with load Z as you could tune the final and drive to accomodate that. Some might say, "why not just mount a vertical?" Well, I have the 2:1 balun and I figured that the loop would be much quieter. I'm not sure how you have come up with, or plan to come up with a 2:1 BalUn - not very common, and construction details may ruin expectations for performance. As for "quieter," that is a very common myth = t'ain't so. As for other details, you only roughly describe the length of wire involved (in only one dimension) and you say nothing of frequency - except by inference in the 80M band. Such details impact Z considerably if you want someone to supply you with that characteristic. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 17, 11:53*am, Richard Clark wrote:
I'm not sure how you have come up with, or plan to come up with a 2:1 BalUn - not very common, and construction details may ruin expectations for performance. I already have the 2:1 BalUn on hand. It is a Balun Designs offering. The link is supplied below. http://www.balundesigns.com/servlet/...uns/Categories As for "quieter," that is a very common myth = t'ain't so. Drats! I suppose I'll just have to hope for the best. As for other details, you only roughly describe the length of wire involved (in only one dimension) and you say nothing of frequency - except by inference in the 80M band. *Such details impact Z considerably if you want someone to supply you with that characteristic. I want this to be a 10m semi-omnidirectional antenna. (Clover leaf pattern I'd guess. Omni enough fo me.) My reference to 80m was just a passing statement re. my schedule. Take care es... Vy 73 de Bert WA2SI |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 17, 7:06*am, WA2SI wrote:
Yes, the goal is a single band, quiet and physically unobtrusive single-band omni-directional. (Or at least somewhat omni-directional without being a cloudburner.) Visualize, if you will, two wire Christmas tree shaped wire loops, 90 degrees from one another, fed at the center of their bottom legs up abt 30'. If I'm understanding this, what you are proposing would actually be horizontally polarized, not vertical. I imagine the triangle shape distorts things, but in general if you feed a loop at either the top or the bottom, it will be horizontal. You want to feed from one of the sides for it to be vertical. Which calls for a square for most people.. Actually, what you want to build is very common. Most refer to them as an "eggbeater". The usual method of feeding the elements is 90 degrees out of phase if I remember right. That gives the most omnidirectional pattern. Some might say, "why not just mount a vertical?" Well, I have the 2:1 balun and I figured that the loop would be much quieter. As Richard mentioned, this is fiction. All antennas receive noise. How much you receive depends on the polarity of the antenna, the noise source, and the efficiency of the system. It's quite possible for the horizontal antenna to receive the most noise if the noise is radiated from a horizontal source. It's possible for an antenna to be very "quiet" if it's very inefficient. Actually, if I notice an antenna that is too "quiet" I start to wonder what the heck is wrong with it.. :/ Noisy is good. Maybe not the noise itself, but that you receive it well is good. You don't want it any other way, unless maybe you are a proponent of the Unwintennas which tend to be air cooled dummy loads.. ![]() A good elevated vertical is actually a very good 10m antenna. It's good for DX, but it's also good for space wave coverage to locals. |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 17 abr, 14:06, WA2SI wrote:
On Apr 13, 1:36*pm, Richard Clark wrote: As there are so many details of construction are missing, little more can be said, and our original poster appears to have gotten bored with the topic. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC Hello agn, everybody: My apologies to you all. No, I have not gotten bored with this topic. My job has rotating schedules as well as mandatory overtime. Unfortunately, when one gets "stuck" for o/t, it's usually for an entire extra 8-1/2 tour. When I finally get home, (A nice hike, btw!) I either attend to my familial obligations or just crash. I did manage to work a 5R8 station on the bottom of 80 so all was not lost - hihi. I was thinking of making use of some unused space on my 50' fiberglass mast by mounting a 2:1 balun and having two 10m vertically polarized delta loops sharing the same feed points, specifically the aforementioned balun. Yes, the goal is a single band, quiet and physically unobtrusive single-band omni-directional. (Or at least somewhat omni-directional without being a cloudburner.) Visualize, if you will, two wire Christmas tree shaped wire loops, 90 degrees from one another, fed at the center of their bottom legs up abt 30'. Some might say, "why not just mount a vertical?" Well, I have the 2:1 balun and I figured that the loop would be much quieter. Thanks so much for all your responses and have a safe and wonderful weekend. Take care es... Vy 73 de Bert, WA2SI Hello Bert, When it is quieter and isn't a dummy load, it is more or less a cloudburner. The reason for more noise is mostly caused by less elevation of the main lobe due to the interference from the ground reflection. This is what you want for line-of-sight and DX. The vertical is a good option for sky wave and line-of-sight. When you make it electrically a half wave, requirements for ground are very limited. The only disadvantage is the matching section as the impedance at half wave resonance is rather high (up to 1 kOhm for thin conductors). When you run high power, you have to evaluate your construction for corona discharge. Maybe you can use parts from CB antennas. Best regards, Wim PA3DJS www.tetech.nl in case of PM, please don't forget to remove abc |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Full-wave coaxial loop? | Antenna | |||
"Fan" Full Wave Loops? | Antenna | |||
Full Wave Loop Question | Antenna | |||
Full wave loops - alternate design? | Shortwave | |||
Question about Full Wave loop | Antenna |