Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would like to test the impedance characteristics of a rectangular
full-wave loop antenna. My test equipment is 50 ohms unbalanced. Frequency is 450 MHz. What are my choices to achieve the conversion from balanced to unbalanced and which might be the best (affordable) choice for my test purposes? Cheers, John, KD5YI |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 02 May 2010 20:33:22 -0500, John KD5YI wrote:
I would like to test the impedance characteristics of a rectangular full-wave loop antenna. My test equipment is 50 ohms unbalanced. Frequency is 450 MHz. What are my choices to achieve the conversion from balanced to unbalanced and which might be the best (affordable) choice for my test purposes? Cheers, John, KD5YI Agilent Application Note AN 346-2 should provide the information you're looking for You can get a copy of AN 346-2 for yourself he http://cp.literature.agilent.com/lit...5091-4480E.pdf Hope that helps. 73, Danny, K6MHE |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3 mayo, 03:33, John KD5YI wrote:
I would like to test the impedance characteristics of a rectangular full-wave loop antenna. My test equipment is 50 ohms unbalanced. Frequency is 450 MHz. What are my choices to achieve the conversion from balanced to unbalanced and which might be the best (affordable) choice for my test purposes? Cheers, John, KD5YI Hello John, There are many options for your frequency range. Try to get some ferrite rings that tight fit around the coaxial cable and that have high impedance around your frequency. When you have specs (from the ferrite you use) this is the easiest one that doesn't require any tuning. connect the feed cable to a solid ground at 0.23 lambda from its end (where the loop is). The low common mode Z at the short results in a high common mode Z at the end (where the loop is). two strips of about 0.22 lambda can also serve as a floating ground. you can make a bazooka type choke (about quarter wave sleeve around the cable). Best is to have lots of air between the sleeve and the coaxial cable. This one requires some experimentation as the actual length depends on the dielectric around the cable also. When your loop impedance turns-out to be high, your balun must be better as the common mode voltage component increases with high impedance balanced antennas. I see you are working on a full wave loop, this one is not high Z (below 200 Ohms). Good luck with the loop measurements, Wim PA3DJS www.tetech.nl remove abc first in case of PM |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/3/2010 1:09 PM, Wimpie wrote:
On 3 mayo, 03:33, John wrote: I would like to test the impedance characteristics of a rectangular full-wave loop antenna. My test equipment is 50 ohms unbalanced. Frequency is 450 MHz. What are my choices to achieve the conversion from balanced to unbalanced and which might be the best (affordable) choice for my test purposes? Cheers, John, KD5YI Hello John, There are many options for your frequency range. Try to get some ferrite rings that tight fit around the coaxial cable and that have high impedance around your frequency. When you have specs (from the ferrite you use) this is the easiest one that doesn't require any tuning. connect the feed cable to a solid ground at 0.23 lambda from its end (where the loop is). The low common mode Z at the short results in a high common mode Z at the end (where the loop is). two strips of about 0.22 lambda can also serve as a floating ground. you can make a bazooka type choke (about quarter wave sleeve around the cable). Best is to have lots of air between the sleeve and the coaxial cable. This one requires some experimentation as the actual length depends on the dielectric around the cable also. When your loop impedance turns-out to be high, your balun must be better as the common mode voltage component increases with high impedance balanced antennas. I see you are working on a full wave loop, this one is not high Z (below 200 Ohms). Good luck with the loop measurements, Wim PA3DJS www.tetech.nl remove abc first in case of PM Thanks, Wim. Good suggestions. I'll give them a try. Cheers, John, KD5YI |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/3/2010 8:18 AM, danny wrote:
On Sun, 02 May 2010 20:33:22 -0500, John KD5YI wrote: I would like to test the impedance characteristics of a rectangular full-wave loop antenna. My test equipment is 50 ohms unbalanced. Frequency is 450 MHz. What are my choices to achieve the conversion from balanced to unbalanced and which might be the best (affordable) choice for my test purposes? Cheers, John, KD5YI Agilent Application Note AN 346-2 should provide the information you're looking for You can get a copy of AN 346-2 for yourself he http://cp.literature.agilent.com/lit...5091-4480E.pdf Hope that helps. 73, Danny, K6MHE I appreciate the link, Danny. I'll study the article. Cheers, John, KD5YI |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Auto-Tuners with balanced antenna? | Antenna | |||
Balanced from unbalanced via a 100 ohm Q section - followup | Antenna | |||
Balanced from unbalanced via a 100 ohm Q section | Antenna | |||
"Ununs" = 'UN' to 'UN' { Unbalanced-to-Unbalanced Matching Transformer } | Shortwave | |||
Balanced vs. Unbalanced Tuner | Antenna |