Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 27, 6:22*am, K1TTT wrote:
On May 23, 2:17*am, Art Unwin wrote: I just modeled two coils counter wound and one inside the other as a complete closed circuit , end fed. Counter winding is quite the norm with special purpose machinery to prevent inter tangling of coils when compressed. With the coils wound opposite to each other it made quite a nice antenna when placed on a flat plate. Beam was pencil shaped without side lobes and sensitive to all polarities.Thus any such dishes could be used for 'point to point' using any type circular polarization. *Smaller in size compared to other designs is rather obvious. Where Kraus determined such an antenna single wound form demanded a certain angular pitch such a requirement is not apparent with this design. Kraus assumed a certain pitch was required when wave composition clashed, but the opposite happens when particles vectors add. Another example of particle versus waves disputes.It also confirms Maxwells equation by removing the effect of lumped loads which was not included in his equation as was not the stipulation that a radiator must be straight. Caution: Above details not yet "printed" in a book so it must be considered questionable. Regards Art you have a nice little web site, please publish the design file and picture of the antenna so we can all have a good laugh at it. I expect to put some more things on my page especially the model that I am honing now. Now I have a 8 inch dia coil about 4 inches high relatively close wound. Inside is the counter wound coil connected to the other coil to make a closed circuit. It is placed on a perfect ground in leau of a reflector. What I have done is balanced the inductance with the capacitance, as you move around in frequency it will always be close to resistive because of the balancing I have done. It takes a while for the program to work from near near resistance (.01 ohms) and I have now reached 11 ohms for 16.5 dbi gain where the lower resistance gave me about 30 dbi The resistance values are wave like as is the variation in gain per cycle. Field shape so far varies from elliptical to something like the double. zepp. My intention is to plot up to 20 ohms and that will take several times longer than that taken already. The model has about a dozen sections per winding and I am pretty much limited to 10 segments per section. All very interesting because I am following the idea of canceling all lumped loads in line with Maxwells laws that deals only with distributed loads. Frequency range covered up to now is 685 to 1200Mhz With this amount of information you can start laughing now well before I put it up Art |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A gaussian style radiating antenna | Antenna | |||
Icom AH-4 mobile users: radiating element? | Antenna | |||
Icom AH-4 mobile users: radiating element? | Equipment | |||
Non-radiating Feedlines? | Antenna | |||
Physical size of radiating element? | Antenna |