Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I recently was able to use a crimp on tool for F connectors for RG-6 quad
shield coax. To make sure everyone understands, I am in Israel, and RG-6 quad shield coax is cheap and easy to find. Any other coax is almost impossible to find. Pl-259 connectors, called "UHF" connectors here are rare items. I can get them locally, but I have to special order them and they are expensive. Since I can not see them before I order them, I am as likely to get nickle plated ones with phenolic insulation as I am to get any other kind, and once ordered are not returnable. BNC to PL-259 adaptors, are easy to get, and can be ordered from a reliable local souce for a relatively small price. The same with N to PL-259. Looking around at the crimp-on F connectors before I ordered them, I found that you can get crimp on BNC connectors for RG-6 quad shield coax. Here's my questions, Note when I say crimp-on, I mean the ones that crimp from the rear, like commerical F connectors, not the ones that crimp around the plug. I have never been able to get any of them to "fit right": 1. Can I connect a 75ohm BNC plug (which is a different size) to a 50oHm BNC socket? 2. Are there crimp on 50 ohm BNC plugs which will work with RG6 quad shield? I know there are variations, but most are similar in size. 3. Are there crimp on N connectors that would fit the RG6 quad shield coax? More likely due to the size a crimp on center element that screws into the plug body? 4. Are there crimp on PL-259 connectors? Thanks in advance, Geoff. -- Geoffrey S. Mendelson, Jerusalem, Israel N3OWJ/4X1GM New word I coined 12/13/09, "Sub-Wikipedia" adj, describing knowledge or understanding, as in he has a sub-wikipedia understanding of the situation. i.e possessing less facts or information than can be found in the Wikipedia. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Geoffrey S. Mendelson" wrote in
: I recently was able to use a crimp on tool for F connectors for RG-6 quad shield coax. To make sure everyone understands, I am in Israel, and RG-6 quad shield coax is cheap and easy to find. Any other coax is almost impossible to find. Pl-259 connectors, called "UHF" connectors here are rare items. I can get them locally, but I have to special order them and they are expensive. Since I can not see them before I order them, I am as likely to get nickle plated ones with phenolic insulation as I am to get any other kind, and once ordered are not returnable. BNC to PL-259 adaptors, are easy to get, and can be ordered from a reliable local souce for a relatively small price. The same with N to PL-259. Looking around at the crimp-on F connectors before I ordered them, I found that you can get crimp on BNC connectors for RG-6 quad shield coax. Here's my questions, Note when I say crimp-on, I mean the ones that crimp from the rear, like commerical F connectors, not the ones that crimp around the plug. I have never been able to get any of them to "fit right": 1. Can I connect a 75ohm BNC plug (which is a different size) to a 50oHm BNC socket? There is such a thing as a 75 ohm BNC connector, but you are almost certainly looking at 50 ohm connectors designed for use on 75 ohm cable. My recollection is that the 75 ohm connectors are incompatible with the 50 ohm connectors, and in some combinations will spread the female inner part. 2. Are there crimp on 50 ohm BNC plugs which will work with RG6 quad shield? I know there are variations, but most are similar in size. Yes, see http://www.vk1od.net/transmissionline/RG6/index.htm . 3. Are there crimp on N connectors that would fit the RG6 quad shield coax? I haven't seen any. I use BNC compression connectors on the RG6, then BNC/N adapters to connect to the antenna N connector. Works fine, all waterproof. More likely due to the size a crimp on center element that screws into the plug body? 4. Are there crimp on PL-259 connectors? Yes. They have most of the disadvantages of the PL-259. If you are of the view that everything that comes out of China, leave now. I buy N, BNC, UHF, etc connectors that are of Chinese original that are economical and excellent quality. But... you have to be picky, price is not a good indicator of quality. There is also a prejudice against RG6. Again, quality varies, and you need to inspect carefully and test product that you might use. Owen Thanks in advance, Geoff. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Owen Duffy wrote:
There is such a thing as a 75 ohm BNC connector, but you are almost certainly looking at 50 ohm connectors designed for use on 75 ohm cable. My recollection is that the 75 ohm connectors are incompatible with the 50 ohm connectors, and in some combinations will spread the female inner part. Thanks, The ad I saw said they were 75 ohm. If they really are 50 ohm connectors for 75 ohm cable, so much the better. Without buying them, I have no way to tell, and it's awfully expensive to buy one or two. Shipping from the US to here runs between $20 (USPS) and $50 (FEDEX/DHL/UPS) for anything. I was going to buy $10 worth of soldering iron tips from Farnell, and they wanted a flat rate of $35 to ship them. :-( Yes, see http://www.vk1od.net/transmissionline/RG6/index.htm . I haven't seen any. I use BNC compression connectors on the RG6, then BNC/N adapters to connect to the antenna N connector. Works fine, all waterproof. Wonderful, thanks. I buy N, BNC, UHF, etc connectors that are of Chinese original that are economical and excellent quality. But... you have to be picky, price is not a good indicator of quality. URLs??? Please. There is also a prejudice against RG6. Again, quality varies, and you need to inspect carefully and test product that you might use. As in everything in life. :-) Geoff. -- Geoffrey S. Mendelson, Jerusalem, Israel N3OWJ/4X1GM New word I coined 12/13/09, "Sub-Wikipedia" adj, describing knowledge or understanding, as in he has a sub-wikipedia understanding of the situation. i.e possessing less facts or information than can be found in the Wikipedia. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Geoffrey S. Mendelson" wrote in
: .... I buy N, BNC, UHF, etc connectors that are of Chinese original that are economical and excellent quality. But... you have to be picky, price is not a good indicator of quality. URLs??? Please. Jyebao is Taiwanese, not Chinese, and excellent quality. They have an agent in Israel. http://www.jyebao.com.tw/agent-u.htm Owen |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Owen Duffy wrote:
Jyebao is Taiwanese, not Chinese, and excellent quality. They have an agent in Israel. http://www.jyebao.com.tw/agent-u.htm Thanks. Interestingly enough, they have F-plugs to N jacks, (i.e. cables with F plugs on them to connect to a radio with an N jack) but not F plugs to PL-259(UHF) jacks. :-( 73, Geoff. -- Geoffrey S. Mendelson, Jerusalem, Israel N3OWJ/4X1GM New word I coined 12/13/09, "Sub-Wikipedia" adj, describing knowledge or understanding, as in he has a sub-wikipedia understanding of the situation. i.e possessing less facts or information than can be found in the Wikipedia. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Owen Duffy
writes "Geoffrey S. Mendelson" wrote in : 1. Can I connect a 75ohm BNC plug (which is a different size) to a 50oHm BNC socket? There is such a thing as a 75 ohm BNC connector, but you are almost certainly looking at 50 ohm connectors designed for use on 75 ohm cable. My recollection is that the 75 ohm connectors are incompatible with the 50 ohm connectors, and in some combinations will spread the female inner part. For all intents and purposes, 50 and 75 ohm BNCs (both male and female) are interchangeable. They have essentially the same dimensions. You might just see that the 50 ohm male has a rather stubby point, whereas the 75 ohm version has a somewhat more steadily-tapered pin - but, unlike N-connectors, the 50 ohm male certainly doesn't cause damage to a 75 ohm female. The thing which mainly causes the impedances to differ is the amount of PTFE dielectric present, in both sexes. On the 75 ohm version, you will normally see that it has been reduced considerably compared with the 50 ohm. Even with less dielectric, the 75 ohm version is still a bit unhappy with having too much, and this tends to lower the impedance to somewhat less than 75 ohms. However, for all intents and purposes, you probably won't notice any significant difference between 50 and 75 ohm BNCs (mixed or not). -- Ian |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() [Sorry for being a little late to the party, but I was off newsgroups most of this week.] This thread had some discussion of adapters and I want to share my bad experience with some low-cost items, proving, once again, that you get what you pay for. I am testing all my adapters and discarding some because the assemblies are pulling apart with very little force. One manifestation: tightening the threaded ring on a PL-259 (either cable end connector or adapter) and having the ring just continue all the way on, separating from the connector body. One test for a future failure has been any lack of smoothness when I rotate the ring while tugging it gently. If it binds, rather than turning smoothly in my hands, it's going to fail. Also, some of the cheap connectors are press-fit together very poorly; they pull apart with only a few pounds of pull. Most of my early exposure to coax connectors was in and around the US Navy, where reliable connectors are the rule, so I was a spoiled child. "Sal" (KD6VKW) |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 06/13/2010 01:50 PM, Sal M. O'Nella wrote:
[Sorry for being a little late to the party, but I was off newsgroups most of this week.] This thread had some discussion of adapters and I want to share my bad experience with some low-cost items, proving, once again, that you get what you pay for. I am testing all my adapters and discarding some because the assemblies are pulling apart with very little force. One manifestation: tightening the threaded ring on a PL-259 (either cable end connector or adapter) and having the ring just continue all the way on, separating from the connector body. One test for a future failure has been any lack of smoothness when I rotate the ring while tugging it gently. If it binds, rather than turning smoothly in my hands, it's going to fail. Also, some of the cheap connectors are press-fit together very poorly; they pull apart with only a few pounds of pull. Most of my early exposure to coax connectors was in and around the US Navy, where reliable connectors are the rule, so I was a spoiled child. "Sal" (KD6VKW) PL-259's I can handle. BNC's drive me nuts trying to get a good connection. I gave up and just buy my cables now. Bill |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 5 Jun 2010 21:49:32 +0000 (UTC), "Geoffrey S. Mendelson"
wrote: I recently was able to use a crimp on tool for F connectors for RG-6 quad shield coax. Hopefully, it was a "push-on" tool and connector http://www.arrisistore.com/digicon/Digicon-F-Connector-Installation-Guide.pdf not the piece of junk with the small crimped ring. To make sure everyone understands, I am in Israel, and RG-6 quad shield coax is cheap and easy to find. There's quality RG-6a/u and junk. On the left coast of the USA, we have both in copious quantities. I obtain mine directly from a satellite DTV install company, so the quality is more towards quality than junk. Pl-259 connectors, called "UHF" connectors here are rare items. Be thankful. I find them to be a necessary evil as most ham radios require them. Meanwhile, commercial radios are moving away from UHF and toward other connectors, such as Type-N, BNC, TNC, Mini-UHF, and SMA. However, Comerica base antennas remain UHF or Type-N. BNC to PL-259 adaptors, are easy to get, and can be ordered from a reliable local souce for a relatively small price. The same with N to PL-259. That's what I do. Most of my cables are NOT terminated with UHF connectors. If I need to go to UHF, I use an adapter. Looking around at the crimp-on F connectors before I ordered them, I found that you can get crimp on BNC connectors for RG-6 quad shield coax. Yes, they work. I use quite a bit of RG-6a/u and prefer to have everything terminated by the same connector, which is the CATV standard F connector. If I need BNC, I use an adapter. Here's my questions, Note when I say crimp-on, I mean the ones that crimp from the rear, like commerical F connectors, not the ones that crimp around the plug. I have never been able to get any of them to "fit right": Agreed. The good ones are "push on" F connectors. 1. Can I connect a 75ohm BNC plug (which is a different size) to a 50oHm BNC socket? There are such things as real 75 ohm BNC plugs and jacks. They're easy to recognize because they lack the PTFE dielectric. The 75 ohm connectors will mate properly with the 50 ohm connectors. There is little risk of VSWR problems from using 50 ohm connectors on RG-6a/u. http://www.qsl.net/n9zia/wireless/75_ohm_hardline.html Basically, any small loss from VSWR is compensated by the lower loss per meter of RG-6a/u as compared to RG-58a/u. Methinks you're safe using all 50 ohm connectors.[1] 2. Are there crimp on 50 ohm BNC plugs which will work with RG6 quad shield? I know there are variations, but most are similar in size. They're nearly identical in dimensions. The 50 ohm variety have some manner of PTFE dielectric. The 75 ohm variety use a plastic disk and no dielectric. http://www.amphenolconnex.com/products/bnc.asp "50 ohm and 75 ohm connectors are intermateable to ensure non-destructive mating" The catch is that there's no guarantee that this is true between different manufacturers. I've blundered across mutations and variations that are NOT interchangeable. 3. Are there crimp on N connectors that would fit the RG6 quad shield coax? More likely due to the size a crimp on center element that screws into the plug body? Probably, but I wouldn't use one. Just terminate in an F connector, and use an F to N adapter. The price will probably be the same or less. However, if you must go direct, any N connector that will fit RG-59a/u will usually work with RG-6a/u. The problem is that depending on the number of shields in the RG-6a/u, the outer diameter will vary, making the diameter of the crimp ring an issue. Doing this is risky and may result in a non-fitting connector. I would use an adapter, which will always work. 4. Are there crimp on PL-259 connectors? Also probably, but again, methinks you're better off with an F connector and an adapter. [1] I just counted 7 assorted coaxial cables going between my roof and various RF devices in my house. All but one are 75 ohm RG-6a/u. Some are double shielded, while others are quad shielded. The connectors are slightly different. All the HF and VHF/UHF antennas use 75 ohm coax. The one 50 ohm LMR-400 run is for the 900MHz antenna. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Mixing high side versus low side and (f1 - f2) versus (f1 + f2) | Homebrew | |||
796 versus 780 | Scanner | |||
IC-735 versus IC-726 | Dx | |||
IC-735 versus IC-726 | Dx | |||
ic-735 versus ic-726 | General |